Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4288080869> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W4288080869 endingPage "91" @default.
- W4288080869 startingPage "70" @default.
- W4288080869 abstract "In the earlier decision in State Information Technology Agency SOC Ltd v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd the Constitutional Court concluded that the legality principle and not the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (the PAJA) applies to state self-reviews of administrative decisions. This was justified on the basis that the state, unlike a private litigant, is not a bearer of the right to administrative justice and is, for this reason, prevented from relying on the PAJA to review its own prior decisions (the Gijima principle). The Court, however, stated that its conclusion was limited to instances where a state organ reviews its own decision and acts in its own interest for the purposes of section 38(a) of the Constitution. This note explores the implications of the SCA’s later decision in Compcare Wellness Medical Scheme v Registrar of Medical Schemes for the Gijima principle. In substance, Compcare concluded that whenever a state organ seeks the review and setting aside of its own administrative action or that of another state organ, it must rely on the PAJA. This is because it will always be seeking to enforce the right to just administrative action in the public interest in terms of section 38(d) of the Constitution, and never in its own interests for the purposes of section 38(a). Although Compcare was concerned with a scenario that fell outside of the Gijima principle, the principled effect of the judgment is to resuscitate the PAJA in all state self-reviews of administrative actions and in so doing, to defeat the basic premise in Gijima that the state cannot rely on the PAJA." @default.
- W4288080869 created "2022-07-28" @default.
- W4288080869 creator A5059707099 @default.
- W4288080869 date "2022-04-03" @default.
- W4288080869 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4288080869 title "Resuscitating the PAJA in state self-review? <i>Compcare Wellness Medical Scheme v Registrar of Medical Schemes</i>" @default.
- W4288080869 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2099456" @default.
- W4288080869 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4288080869 type Work @default.
- W4288080869 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4288080869 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4288080869 hasAuthorship W4288080869A5059707099 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C2776515129 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C2778120072 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C42027317 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C108170787 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C11413529 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C121332964 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C124952713 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C139621336 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C142362112 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C144024400 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C17744445 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C199539241 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C2776154427 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C2776515129 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C2778120072 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C2780791683 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C36289849 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C41008148 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C42027317 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C48103436 @default.
- W4288080869 hasConceptScore W4288080869C62520636 @default.
- W4288080869 hasIssue "1-2" @default.
- W4288080869 hasLocation W42880808691 @default.
- W4288080869 hasOpenAccess W4288080869 @default.
- W4288080869 hasPrimaryLocation W42880808691 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2049840623 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2209731669 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2362450374 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2370772718 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2379461378 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2379669655 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2649471703 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W2757040966 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W3005065480 @default.
- W4288080869 hasRelatedWork W610642046 @default.
- W4288080869 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W4288080869 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4288080869 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4288080869 workType "article" @default.