FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4288447401> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4288447401 endingPage "8" @default.
• W4288447401 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4288447401 abstract "Background. Needle-warming moxibustion (NWM) demonstrates a controversial effect on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy of NWM and conventional acupuncture or other physical therapies on LDH through a meta-analysis. Methods. Potentially eligible literatures were retrieved and screened from electronic databases. The subject of the literature was a comparison of NWM and conventional acupuncture or other physical therapies for LDH. The methodological quality was evaluated by the Jadad scale. The chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to describe the effect size. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger’s test. Results. The effective rate of NWM in the treatment of LDH was significantly higher than that of conventional acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M1> <mtext>RR</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.27</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>1.18</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.36</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </math> ) and lumbar traction ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M2> <mtext>RR</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.12</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>1.06</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.18</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> ) There was no significant difference in the effective rate between NWM and electric acupuncture for LDH ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M3> <mtext>RR</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.06</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>0.98</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.14</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.17</mn> </math> ). VAS of LDH patients treated with NWM was lower than conventional acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M4> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1.51</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1.70</mn> <mrow> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mn>1.31</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </math> ) and lumbar traction ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M5> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2.64</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2.79</mn> <mrow> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mn>2.49</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </math> ) but statistically insignificant with electric acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M6> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.31</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.72</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.09</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </math> ). JOA scores of LDH patients treated with NWM were higher than those with conventional acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M7> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.24</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>1.04</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>3.45</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.0003</mn> </math> ) and lumbar traction ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M8> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.76</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>10.45</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>11.07</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </math> ) but statistically insignificant with electric acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M9> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mtext> </mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>0.95</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1.45</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.69</mn> </math> ). The long-term effective rate of NWM on LDH was higher than that of conventional acupuncture ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M10> <mtext>MD</mtext> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3.13</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mi>%</mi> <mtext>CI</mtext> <mfenced open=[ close=]> <mrow> <mn>2.12</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>4.61</mn> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.00001</mn> </math> ). In this study, no heterogeneity ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M11> <mi>P</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.10</mn> <mo>,</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi>I</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo><</mo> <mn>50</mn> <mi>%</mi> </math> ) and publication bias ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M12> <mi>P</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ) among the literature were noted. Conclusion. The effect of NWM on LDH was superior to traction therapy and conventional acupuncture therapy, but similar to electric acupuncture for LDH. High-quality randomized controlled trials were still needed to confirm the results." @default.
• W4288447401 created "2022-07-29" @default.
• W4288447401 creator A5018892762 @default.
• W4288447401 creator A5038003783 @default.
• W4288447401 creator A5048288156 @default.
• W4288447401 creator A5052907339 @default.
• W4288447401 creator A5088427125 @default.
• W4288447401 date "2022-07-28" @default.
• W4288447401 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4288447401 title "Comparison of Needle-Warming Moxibustion and Other Physical Therapies for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-analysis" @default.
• W4288447401 cites W1826282516 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W194320495 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2078990683 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2394564481 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2418404695 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2551320170 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2555508070 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2561641472 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2580415328 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2596435795 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2780823103 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2890043530 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W2902722609 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W3012411836 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W3129368997 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W3142403588 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W3174402272 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W3183539757 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W4226277132 @default.
• W4288447401 cites W4287030684 @default.
• W4288447401 doi "https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2986223" @default.
• W4288447401 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35936359" @default.
• W4288447401 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4288447401 type Work @default.
• W4288447401 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4288447401 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4288447401 hasAuthorship W4288447401A5018892762 @default.
• W4288447401 hasAuthorship W4288447401A5038003783 @default.
• W4288447401 hasAuthorship W4288447401A5048288156 @default.
• W4288447401 hasAuthorship W4288447401A5052907339 @default.
• W4288447401 hasAuthorship W4288447401A5088427125 @default.
• W4288447401 hasBestOaLocation W42884474011 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C136524200 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C2992636618 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C56837625 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C126322002 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C136524200 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C141071460 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C142724271 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C204787440 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C2776478404 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C2989005 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C2992636618 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C44249647 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C44575665 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C56837625 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C71924100 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C82789193 @default.
• W4288447401 hasConceptScore W4288447401C95190672 @default.
• W4288447401 hasLocation W42884474011 @default.
• W4288447401 hasLocation W42884474012 @default.
• W4288447401 hasLocation W42884474013 @default.
• W4288447401 hasOpenAccess W4288447401 @default.
• W4288447401 hasPrimaryLocation W42884474011 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W1885119863 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W1984317388 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2318187771 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2355125406 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2377276149 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2381293387 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2592774827 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2614276645 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W2626084264 @default.
• W4288447401 hasRelatedWork W4213184690 @default.
• W4288447401 hasVolume "2022" @default.
• W4288447401 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4288447401 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4288447401 workType "article" @default.