FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4288702947> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4288702947 abstract "Efficient detection tools for determining staphylococcal pleural infection are critical for its eradication. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) in suspected empyema cases to identify staphylococcal strains and avoid unnecessary empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) therapy.From inception to July 24, 2021, relevant records were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve for NAAT's diagnostic performance were evaluated using an HSROC model.Eight studies comprising 424 samples evaluated NAAT accuracy for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) identification, while four studies comprising 317 samples evaluated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identification. The pooled NAAT summary estimates for detection of both SA (sensitivity: 0.35 (95% CI 0.19-0.55), specificity: 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), PLR: 7.92 (95% CI 4.98-12.59), NLR: 0.44 (95% CI 0.14-1.46), and DOR: 24.0 (95% CI 6.59-87.61) ) and MRSA (sensitivity: 0.45 (95% CI 0.15-0.78), specificity: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.95), PLR: 10.06 (95% CI 1.49-67.69), NLR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.15), and DOR: 27.18 (95% CI 2.97-248.6) ) were comparable. The I2 statistical scores for MRSA and SA identification sensitivity were 13.7% and 74.9%, respectively, indicating mild to substantial heterogeneity. PCR was frequently used among NAA tests, and its diagnostic accuracy coincided well with the overall summary estimates. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis of country, setting, study design, patient selection, and sample condition could not explain the heterogeneity (meta-regression P = 0.66, P = 0.46, P = 0.98, P = 0.68, and P = 0.79, respectively) in diagnostic effectiveness.Our study suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of NAA tests is currently inadequate to substitute culture as a principal screening test. NAAT could be used in conjunction with microbiological culture due to the advantage of faster results and in situations where culture tests are not doable." @default.
• W4288702947 created "2022-07-30" @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5023246289 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5031006998 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5037230542 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5039778990 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5040620103 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5053769309 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5071654271 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5081097049 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5084188467 @default.
• W4288702947 creator A5089671537 @default.
• W4288702947 date "2022-07-29" @default.
• W4288702947 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W4288702947 title "Clinical relevance of molecular testing methods in the diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with staphylococcal empyema: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4288702947 cites W1886201331 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W1978248152 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W1981190713 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W1984164114 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2020488794 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2052898288 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2076805806 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2108433768 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2113009004 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2116533402 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2120166757 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2130566249 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2159733545 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2169160087 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2738926285 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2766981769 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2785704959 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2905730139 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2912956080 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2937508730 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2955026656 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2977758246 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W3127020281 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W3139523726 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W3178994031 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W3191898780 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W4206014813 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W4229043485 @default.
• W4288702947 cites W2124030794 @default.
• W4288702947 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.758833" @default.
• W4288702947 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35967859" @default.
• W4288702947 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4288702947 type Work @default.
• W4288702947 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4288702947 countsByYear W42887029472022 @default.
• W4288702947 countsByYear W42887029472023 @default.
• W4288702947 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5023246289 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5031006998 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5037230542 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5039778990 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5040620103 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5053769309 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5071654271 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5081097049 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5084188467 @default.
• W4288702947 hasAuthorship W4288702947A5089671537 @default.
• W4288702947 hasBestOaLocation W42887029471 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C144494922 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C157481446 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C2777052132 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C2777799383 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C2779489039 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C76318530 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C126322002 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C141071460 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C144494922 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C156957248 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C157481446 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C2776478404 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C2777052132 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C2777799383 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C2779489039 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C523546767 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C54355233 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C58471807 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C71924100 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C76318530 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C86803240 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C90924648 @default.
• W4288702947 hasConceptScore W4288702947C95190672 @default.

• next