FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4289175143> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4289175143 endingPage "4460" @default.
• W4289175143 startingPage "4460" @default.
• W4289175143 abstract "Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an accepted alternative to open repair (OR) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) despite “hostile” anatomies that may reduce its effectiveness. Guidelines suggest refraining from EVAR in such circumstances, but in clinical practice, up to 44% of EVAR procedures are performed using stent grafts outside their instruction for use (IFU), with acceptable outcomes. Starting from this “inconsistency” between clinical practice and guidelines, the aim of this contribution is to report the technical results of the use of EVAR in challenging anatomies as well as the ethical aspects to identify the criteria by which the “best interest” of the patient can be set. Materials and Methods: A literature review on currently available evidence on standard EVAR using commercially available endografts in patients with hostile aortic neck anatomies was conducted. Medline using the PubMed interface and The Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 6 May 2021, considering the following outcomes: technical success; need for additional procedures; conversion to OR; reintervention; migration; the presence of type I endoleaks; AAA-related mortality rate. Results: A total of 52 publications were selected by the investigators for a detailed review. All studies were either prospective or retrospective observational studies reporting the immediate, 30-day, and/or follow-up outcomes of standard EVAR procedures in patients with challenging neck anatomies. No randomized trials were identified. Fourteen different endo-grafts systems were used in the selected studies. A total of 45 studies reported a technical success rate ranging from 93 to 100%, and 42 the need for additional procedures (mean value of 9.04%). Results at 30 days: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 37 studies with a mean value of 2.65%; 31 studies reported a null migration rate and 32 a null conversion rate to OR; in 31 of the 35 studies that reported AAA-related mortality, the incidence was null. Mid-term follow-up: the incidence rate of type Ia endoleak was reported by 48 studies with a mean value of 6.65%; 30 studies reported a null migration rate, 33 a null conversion rate to OR, and 28 of the 45 studies reported that the AAA-related mortality incidence was null. Conclusions: Based on the present analysis, EVAR appears to be a safe and effective procedure—and therefore recommendable—even in the presence of hostile anatomies, in patients deemed unfit for OR. However, in order to identify and pursue the patient’s best interest, particular attention must be paid to the management of the patient’s informed consent process, which—in addition to being an essential ethical-legal requirement to legitimize the medical act—ensures that clinical data can be integrated with the patient’s personal preferences and background, beyond the therapeutic potential of the proposed procedures and what is generically stated in the guidelines." @default.
• W4289175143 created "2022-08-01" @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5009638646 @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5011485427 @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5039740606 @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5045702393 @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5072558454 @default.
• W4289175143 creator A5079178985 @default.
• W4289175143 date "2022-07-30" @default.
• W4289175143 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4289175143 title "Is Evar Feasible in Challenging Aortic Neck Anatomies? A Technical Review and Ethical Discussion" @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1485843649 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1684915161 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1780494103 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W18309558 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1970048984 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1971009942 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1973719380 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1980228909 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1996624918 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W1998748678 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2003008031 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2003257855 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2005059057 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2008875394 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2011682606 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2016007215 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2026983715 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2028845077 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2039396884 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2042045253 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2046971693 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2047536782 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2060062224 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2067064234 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2067556358 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2067639198 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2070228565 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2070395010 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2078432575 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2083543300 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2095102469 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2101330558 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2105122046 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2130148734 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2136738478 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2138190899 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2156798468 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2159655209 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2160648471 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2165498862 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2183949593 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2265546750 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2298283112 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2319823896 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2327968029 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2338227561 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2372070161 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2412193608 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2530128647 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2568061964 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2579139898 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2590686572 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2592491416 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2600353811 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2604626985 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2610395902 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2610897522 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2621206099 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2640409816 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2732837270 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2754564395 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2757558617 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2773904543 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2776247479 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2779510814 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2804302213 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2807638465 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2809950384 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2886820789 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2895713933 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2896009015 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2902783010 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2904766793 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2944460449 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2965615278 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W2993969313 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W3013069860 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W3040946398 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W3110756124 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W3155386963 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W3196685825 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W4214606675 @default.
• W4289175143 cites W4281775339 @default.
• W4289175143 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154460" @default.
• W4289175143 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35956076" @default.
• W4289175143 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4289175143 type Work @default.

• next