FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4291939964> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4291939964 abstract "Abstract Background The majority of patients may experience atelectasis under general anesthesia, and the Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum can aggravate atelectasis during laparoscopic surgery, which promotes postoperative pulmonary complications. Lung recruitment manoeuvres have been proven to reduce perioperative atelectasis, but it remains controversial which method is optimal. Ultrasonic imaging can be conducive to confirming the effect of lung recruitment manoeuvres. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres by ultrasonography on reducing perioperative atelectasis and to check whether the effects of recruitment manoeuvres under ultrasound guidance (visual and semiquantitative) on atelectasis are superior to sustained inflation recruitment manoeuvres (classical and widely used) in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Methods In this randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, women undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (UD group), sustained inflation alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (SI group), or no RMs (C group) using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Lung ultrasonography was performed at four predefined time points. The primary outcome was the difference in lung ultrasound score (LUS) among groups at the end of surgery. Results Lung ultrasound scores in the UD group were significantly lower than those in both the SI group and the C group immediately after the end of surgery (7.67 ± 1.15 versus 9.70 ± 102, difference, -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -2.77 to -1.29], P < 0.001; 7.67 ± 1.15 versus 11.73 ± 1.96, difference, -4.07 [95% confidence interval, -4.81 to -3.33], P < 0.001;, respectively). The intergroup differences were sustained until 30 min after tracheal extubation (9.33 ± 0.96 versus 11.13 ± 0.97, difference, -1.80 [95% confidence interval, -2.42 to -1.18], P < 0.001; 9.33 ± 0.96 versus 10.77 ± 1.57, difference, -1.43 [95% confidence interval, -2.05 to -0.82], P < 0.001;, respectively). The SI group had a significantly lower LUS than the C group at the end of surgery (9.70 ± 1.02 versus 11.73 ± 1.96, difference, -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -2.77 to -1.29] P < 0.001), but the benefit did not persist 30 min after tracheal extubation. Conclusions During general anesthesia, ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres can reduce perioperative aeration loss and improve oxygenation. Furthermore, these effects of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis are superior to sustained inflation recruitment manoeuvres. Trial registration Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100042731, Registered 27 January 2021, www.chictr.org.cn ." @default.
• W4291939964 created "2022-08-16" @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5036844498 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5043376907 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5055151897 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5058225466 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5060094082 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5070932307 @default.
• W4291939964 creator A5075889094 @default.
• W4291939964 date "2022-08-16" @default.
• W4291939964 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4291939964 title "Effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres compared with sustained inflation or no recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomized clinical trial" @default.
• W4291939964 cites W1980449658 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2002036854 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2026450237 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2050268407 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2091106913 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2121156219 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2132266880 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2133957981 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2136420364 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2144542199 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2153134843 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2159043785 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2162001089 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2169568828 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2291900475 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2406693331 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2411981592 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2520396854 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2548363772 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2552081789 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2552328820 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2556793505 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2586663427 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2593110938 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2736737449 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2737383373 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2758688195 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2761058272 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2761770060 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2777323455 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2795151333 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2805589795 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2927506387 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2965413706 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2979243620 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2982454453 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2988830275 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W2989797479 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W3011713288 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W3042762973 @default.
• W4291939964 cites W3119643438 @default.
• W4291939964 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01798-z" @default.
• W4291939964 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35974310" @default.
• W4291939964 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4291939964 type Work @default.
• W4291939964 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4291939964 countsByYear W42919399642023 @default.
• W4291939964 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5036844498 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5043376907 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5055151897 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5058225466 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5060094082 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5070932307 @default.
• W4291939964 hasAuthorship W4291939964A5075889094 @default.
• W4291939964 hasBestOaLocation W42919399641 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2777714996 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2778746874 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2779526319 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2780878380 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C2781101014 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C126322002 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C126838900 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C141071460 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C143753070 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C168563851 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2776111594 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2777714996 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2778746874 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2779526319 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2780047204 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2780878380 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C2781101014 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C31174226 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C42219234 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C44249647 @default.
• W4291939964 hasConceptScore W4291939964C71924100 @default.

• next