FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4292013744> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4292013744 endingPage "496.e8" @default.
• W4292013744 startingPage "496.e1" @default.
• W4292013744 abstract "Statement of problem Information regarding the masking ability of ceramic crowns over different implant abutment materials is scarce. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the masking ability of different monolithic or bilayer ceramic materials with different thicknesses over substrates indicated for implant restorations by using opaque and translucent evaluation pastes. Material and methods Disk-shaped specimens, shade A1 (VITA Classic; Ø10×1.5 to 2.5 mm), of different ceramics (a bilayer system [yttria-stabilized zirconia infrastructure+porcelain veneer: Zir+Pc] and monolithic systems [lithium disilicate under low, medium, or high translucency: LtLD, MtLD, or HtLD, respectively, and a high-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia: HtZir]) were made (n=4). The color difference (ΔE00) was assessed by using the CIEDE2000 formula and considering the different ceramic systems over 5 implant abutment materials (A1 shade Zir [Zir A1]; white Zir [White Zir]; A1 low-translucency lithium disilicate [LD]; polyetheretherketone [PEEK]; and titanium [Ti]) when using 2 different evaluation pastes (translucent or opaque). The control comparison was the restorative material positioned over the Zir A1 substrate with a translucent evaluation paste. Statistical analysis was made by using a 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05) for ΔE00 data considering the restorative material and luting agent factors as their association. Additionally, ΔE00 data were qualitatively analyzed considering the acceptability and perceptibility thresholds. The translucency parameter (TP00) of each restorative material was evaluated, and data were submitted to 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05). Results The most predictable masking ability was seen with Zir+Pc regardless of the evaluation paste used. Nevertheless, under 1.5-mm thickness, Zir+Pc did not adequately mask Ti (ΔE00>1.77). Most monolithic ceramics did not mask discolored substrates (PEEK or Ti, ΔE00>1.77). The exception was HtZir, which presented acceptable masking ability over PEEK at 2.5-mm thickness with both evaluation pastes (ΔE00<1.77). Regardless of the restorative material thickness, Zir+Pc showed the lowest (P<.05) TP00 values (TP00=3.45 at 1.5-mm thickness; TP00=2.00 at 2.5-mm thickness), and HtLD presented the highest (P<.05, TP00=23.50 at 1.5-mm thickness; TP00=13.36 at 2.5-mm thickness). HtZir showed similar TP00 to MtLD at 1.5-mm thickness and similar TP00 to Zir+Pc when used at 2.5-mm thickness (P>.05). Conclusions Monolithic ceramics should be used with caution over discolored implant abutments. Bilayer systems (Zir+Pc) were the most predictable approach to adequately masking discolored substrates such as PEEK or Ti. An increased restoration thickness provided higher masking ability for all restorative materials tested." @default.
• W4292013744 created "2022-08-17" @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5007888063 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5011636971 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5034109194 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5049423924 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5053958478 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5064391644 @default.
• W4292013744 creator A5075374131 @default.
• W4292013744 date "2022-09-01" @default.
• W4292013744 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4292013744 title "Masking ability of implant abutment substrates by using different ceramic restorative systems" @default.
• W4292013744 cites W1821825595 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W1913669301 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W1970376952 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W1980849570 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W1995367568 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2040404915 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2166359730 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2299361251 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2343701798 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2550731778 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2611592650 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2617220590 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2729495067 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2781591278 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2801115524 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2808731430 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2875486540 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2903626921 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2911640282 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W2914550597 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W3010068162 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W3092229300 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W3107673671 @default.
• W4292013744 cites W3165538633 @default.
• W4292013744 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.010" @default.
• W4292013744 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35985853" @default.
• W4292013744 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4292013744 type Work @default.
• W4292013744 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4292013744 countsByYear W42920137442023 @default.
• W4292013744 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5007888063 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5011636971 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5034109194 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5049423924 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5053958478 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5064391644 @default.
• W4292013744 hasAuthorship W4292013744A5075374131 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C123609680 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C2777402240 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C2779989610 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C2908906697 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C2910996203 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C48777230 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C123609680 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C127413603 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C134132462 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C141071460 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C142362112 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C153349607 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C159985019 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C192562407 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C2777402240 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C2779989610 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C2781411149 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C2908906697 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C2910996203 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C48777230 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C66938386 @default.
• W4292013744 hasConceptScore W4292013744C71924100 @default.
• W4292013744 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4292013744 hasLocation W42920137441 @default.
• W4292013744 hasLocation W42920137442 @default.
• W4292013744 hasOpenAccess W4292013744 @default.
• W4292013744 hasPrimaryLocation W42920137441 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W2155144187 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W2406078709 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W2588731965 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W2801933719 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W2994802063 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W3011445083 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W3158235697 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W4200360101 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W4285613172 @default.
• W4292013744 hasRelatedWork W4309684652 @default.
• W4292013744 hasVolume "128" @default.

• next