FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4293063417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4293063417 abstract "This dissertation examines how perceived perspective taking relates to trust repair, specifically in the context of a benevolence-based violation. I draw on perspective taking theory, attribution theory, and the integrative model of organizational trust to explore a model of interpersonal trust repair. The extant literature on trust repair primarily focuses on violations of ability and integrity, leaving the third dimension of trustworthiness, benevolence, largely unexplored. Yet, research suggests as many as 96% of workplace employees have been victims of benevolence-based offenses, such as disrespect, condescension, or degradation. The present research expands the theoretical bounds of the extant trust repair literature to better understand how to repair trust after such violations. I posited that the relationship between perceived perspective taking and benevolence is simultaneously mediated by stability attributions and empathy, where cognitive-driven calculations of whether the cause of the event is stable and affect-driven perceptions of empathy lead to updated perceptions of benevolence. In addition, I proposed that these revised perceptions of benevolence are positively related to trust, but that this relationship is qualified by the victim’s dispositional forgiveness. I conducted two studies to investigate these relationships. Study 1 involved critical incident technique methodology to evoke salient, real-world, benevolence-based violations in established relationships followed by a questionnaire of focal variables to test the full model. This specifically answered the call of scholars to take trust repair studies out of the lab and into the workplace as well as examining established rather than nascent relationships. Study 2 employed an experimental vignette methodology (EVM) that directly manipulated levels of benevolence along with three social accounts. This follow-up study was expected to replicate the expected findings from study 1 as well as more closely examine the role of benevolence and perspective taking by using experimental control. While the results of study 2 were not interpreted due to poor model fit indices, there were several key findings in study 1. First, the relationship between perceived perspective taking and benevolence was fully explained by perceived empathy, and to a lesser extent, unstable causal attributions. Second, restored perceptions of benevolence predicted trust repair. Additionally, empathy and stability attributions were both significantly related with trust repair. Third and finally, dispositional forgiveness failed to moderate the proximal predictors of trust repair. Thus, the overall model received only partial support. The theoretical and practical implications of the study 1 results are discussed along with limitations and opportunities for future research." @default.
• W4293063417 created "2022-08-26" @default.
• W4293063417 creator A5062618946 @default.
• W4293063417 date "2022-05-24" @default.
• W4293063417 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4293063417 title "Care to Walk in My Shoes? Repairing Trust after Violations of Benevolence" @default.
• W4293063417 doi "https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.11182" @default.
• W4293063417 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4293063417 type Work @default.
• W4293063417 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4293063417 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W4293063417 hasAuthorship W4293063417A5062618946 @default.
• W4293063417 hasBestOaLocation W42930634171 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C143299363 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C2778731027 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C2779885105 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConcept C9719361 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C12713177 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C143299363 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C151730666 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C154945302 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C15744967 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C164850336 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C169760540 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C26760741 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C2778731027 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C2779343474 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C2779885105 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C41008148 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C77805123 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C86803240 @default.
• W4293063417 hasConceptScore W4293063417C9719361 @default.
• W4293063417 hasLocation W42930634171 @default.
• W4293063417 hasOpenAccess W4293063417 @default.
• W4293063417 hasPrimaryLocation W42930634171 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W1979644653 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W1986292105 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W2035243276 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W2111683854 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W2335731617 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W2392493829 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W2792888872 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W3035272782 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W3118196436 @default.
• W4293063417 hasRelatedWork W4297238963 @default.
• W4293063417 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4293063417 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4293063417 workType "dissertation" @default.