FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4293092972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4293092972 endingPage "206" @default.
• W4293092972 startingPage "206" @default.
• W4293092972 abstract "Background Following surgery to address intermittent exodeviation, consecutive esotropia (ET), in which postoperative ET continues for more than 6 months, may arise. Both lateral rectus advancement (LRA) and medial rectus recession (MRR) are effective in correction of consecutive ET. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the results of LRA and MRR in correction of consecutive ET (within 40 PD) following bilateral lateral rectus recession for treatment of intermittent exotropia. Patients and methods This was a randomized double-blind controlled trial that included 30 patients who were divided into two groups: group 1 (LRA group, 15 patients) and group 2 (MRR group, 15 patients). Unilateral or bilateral LRA or MRR was done according to the preoperative angle of deviation. All patients had preoperative ocular examination, which included history taking, visual acuity testing, slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, preoperative angle of deviation at near and far using the Krimsky method, stereopsis using the Titmus test, and suppression using the Worth 4-dot test. The patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the preoperative angle of deviation (P=0.213). In group 1, the mean preoperative angle of consecutive ET was 29.0±6.14 PD, which improved to 0.87±3.56 PD 6 months after surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). In group 2, the mean preoperative angle of consecutive ET was 25.47±8.81 PD and improved to 1.67±4.58 PD 6 months after surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the postoperative angle of deviation (P=0.562). Six months postoperatively, there were two (13.3%) undercorrected cases and one (6.7%) overcorrected case, with a success rate of 80% in group 1, whereas in group 2, there were two (13.3%) undercorrected cases and two (13.3%) overcorrected cases, with a success rate of 73.4%, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the success rate (P=0.66). In group 1, the mean preoperative stereoacuity value was 291.7±206.5, which improved significantly postoperatively to 140±35.71 (P=0.005). Similarly, in group 2, the mean preoperative stereoacuity value was 506.7±810.5 and improved significantly postoperatively to 150±46.41, (P=0.003). Conclusion Both LRA and MRR were effective in the correction of consecutive ET." @default.
• W4293092972 created "2022-08-26" @default.
• W4293092972 creator A5009149976 @default.
• W4293092972 creator A5014532070 @default.
• W4293092972 creator A5054509476 @default.
• W4293092972 creator A5076670968 @default.
• W4293092972 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4293092972 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4293092972 title "Medial rectus recession versus lateral rectus advancement in surgical correction of consecutive esotropia" @default.
• W4293092972 cites W2781200884 @default.
• W4293092972 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/djo_69_21" @default.
• W4293092972 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4293092972 type Work @default.
• W4293092972 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4293092972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4293092972 hasAuthorship W4293092972A5009149976 @default.
• W4293092972 hasAuthorship W4293092972A5014532070 @default.
• W4293092972 hasAuthorship W4293092972A5054509476 @default.
• W4293092972 hasAuthorship W4293092972A5076670968 @default.
• W4293092972 hasBestOaLocation W42930929721 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C2776391266 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C2776864138 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C2778207058 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C2779532201 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C66896534 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C118487528 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C120665830 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C121332964 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C141071460 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C2776391266 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C2776864138 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C2778207058 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C2778257484 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C2779532201 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C66896534 @default.
• W4293092972 hasConceptScore W4293092972C71924100 @default.
• W4293092972 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4293092972 hasLocation W42930929721 @default.
• W4293092972 hasOpenAccess W4293092972 @default.
• W4293092972 hasPrimaryLocation W42930929721 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W1993767941 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2072654019 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2094026737 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2243841224 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2323286883 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2351083612 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2413056429 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2414092717 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2895636118 @default.
• W4293092972 hasRelatedWork W2974029164 @default.
• W4293092972 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W4293092972 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4293092972 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4293092972 workType "article" @default.