Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4293379314> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4293379314 endingPage "90" @default.
- W4293379314 startingPage "80" @default.
- W4293379314 abstract "BackgroundThe prone position (PP) used in the treatment of critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, may be a barrier to enteral nutrition (EN). This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and complications of EN in the PP, as well as clinical outcomes.MethodsProspective cohort study with patients in EN and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on mechanical ventilation (MV), which whom needed or not PP. Gastrointestinal intolerances (GII) related to PP were evaluated, and correlated with possible confounding factors. EN, days on MV, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and mortality were analyzed. The data were evaluated daily and compared prone group (PG=57) and supine group (SG=69).ResultsThe PP was associated with GII (P=0.000) and presented in 32 patients (26,44%) with no difference among groups. Association between epinephrine (P=0.003), vasopressin (P=0.018), and GII was observed. There was no difference between the total volume of enteral nutrition (TVEN) infused in the groups. However, the mean EN infused for the days when the patient was on PP was (70.0% ± 31.5) and for the days in supine position was (74.8% ± 27.3), P= 0.006. The PG had a longer time on MV (P=0.005) and ICU (P=0.003) and PP was associated with VAP (P=<0.001). The infused TVEN showed no association with VAP (P=0.09).ConclusionPP was a determining factor in GII and proved to be a risk factor for VAP, but the EN protocol seems to have ensured an adequate EN supply in PP and be a safe alternative. The prone position (PP) used in the treatment of critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, may be a barrier to enteral nutrition (EN). This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and complications of EN in the PP, as well as clinical outcomes. Prospective cohort study with patients in EN and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on mechanical ventilation (MV), which whom needed or not PP. Gastrointestinal intolerances (GII) related to PP were evaluated, and correlated with possible confounding factors. EN, days on MV, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and mortality were analyzed. The data were evaluated daily and compared prone group (PG=57) and supine group (SG=69). The PP was associated with GII (P=0.000) and presented in 32 patients (26,44%) with no difference among groups. Association between epinephrine (P=0.003), vasopressin (P=0.018), and GII was observed. There was no difference between the total volume of enteral nutrition (TVEN) infused in the groups. However, the mean EN infused for the days when the patient was on PP was (70.0% ± 31.5) and for the days in supine position was (74.8% ± 27.3), P= 0.006. The PG had a longer time on MV (P=0.005) and ICU (P=0.003) and PP was associated with VAP (P=<0.001). The infused TVEN showed no association with VAP (P=0.09). PP was a determining factor in GII and proved to be a risk factor for VAP, but the EN protocol seems to have ensured an adequate EN supply in PP and be a safe alternative." @default.
- W4293379314 created "2022-08-28" @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5000867920 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5009683007 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5013458407 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5020331726 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5050121342 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5056771038 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5058077763 @default.
- W4293379314 creator A5070742393 @default.
- W4293379314 date "2022-10-01" @default.
- W4293379314 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4293379314 title "Administration of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal complications in Covid-19 critical patients in prone position" @default.
- W4293379314 cites W1554789200 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W1556869162 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W1803784511 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W1951724000 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W1992162770 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2000445173 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2017345554 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2017555288 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2018856048 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2019153621 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2022342409 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2038688015 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2045179037 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2049730730 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2052643095 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2053589875 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2057524299 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2068556208 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2070317712 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2072328278 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2104710488 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2106923828 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2159519210 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2521036366 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2584454916 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2620241325 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2771876565 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2791854234 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2893877102 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2904392429 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2911622107 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2967558441 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W2991530401 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3008818676 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3009885589 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3014486165 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3024793123 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3030118685 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3039220858 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3090720359 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3114280095 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3120321255 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3126015634 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3131913451 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3133036906 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3133820172 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3165656738 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W3215688922 @default.
- W4293379314 cites W360837428 @default.
- W4293379314 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutos.2022.08.003" @default.
- W4293379314 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36059438" @default.
- W4293379314 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4293379314 type Work @default.
- W4293379314 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W4293379314 countsByYear W42933793142023 @default.
- W4293379314 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5000867920 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5009683007 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5013458407 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5020331726 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5050121342 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5056771038 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5058077763 @default.
- W4293379314 hasAuthorship W4293379314A5070742393 @default.
- W4293379314 hasBestOaLocation W42933793143 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C125567185 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C163100246 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2777080012 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2777184939 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2777914695 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConceptScore W4293379314C125567185 @default.
- W4293379314 hasConceptScore W4293379314C126322002 @default.