Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4294190758> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4294190758 abstract "Abstract Background The construct of working alliance has been used to operationalise the patient–clinician relationship. Research evidence from the rehabilitation literature has established an association between the construct and several patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic literature review was to study working alliance in the chiropractic discipline. Method This review followed a mixed method systematic review methodology: EBSCO (The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), EBSCO (MEDLINE), EBSCO PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Chiro index, and grey literature were searched for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on 17th March 2021. Qualitative appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2018. The qualitative component was synthesised via thematic synthesis and explored patients’ and chiropractors’ perceptions of the nature and role of working alliance. The quantitative component was synthesised via narrative synthesis to examine how the construct has been measured in research and what its effect on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction is. The findings were integrated in the discussion section. Results Thirty studies were included. The qualitative component found that both patients and chiropractors consider working alliance as a key factor in the treatment journey. The findings illustrated that the construct includes the bond between a patient and a chiropractor which is underpinned by trust and attentiveness to patients’ needs, values and preferences. Qualitative data also suggested that strong working alliance has the potential to improve patients’ adherence to treatment and that it is characterised by ongoing negotiation of expectations about the goals of care and the tasks involved in the treatment plan. The quantitative component highlighted that even though working alliance is relevant to the chiropractic discipline, very few studies have quantitatively measured the construct and its effect. Conclusion The findings of this review emphasise the subjective importance of working alliance in the chiropractic clinical encounter. However, there were not enough homogenous studies measuring the effect of working alliance on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction to conduct a meta-analysis. Future research should focus on evaluating potential direct and mediated effects on patient outcomes." @default.
- W4294190758 created "2022-09-02" @default.
- W4294190758 creator A5009584483 @default.
- W4294190758 creator A5024999065 @default.
- W4294190758 creator A5028298318 @default.
- W4294190758 creator A5061608153 @default.
- W4294190758 creator A5069396108 @default.
- W4294190758 date "2022-09-02" @default.
- W4294190758 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4294190758 title "Mixed methods systematic review of the literature base exploring working alliance in the chiropractic profession" @default.
- W4294190758 cites W130219889 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1480229208 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1520975917 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1596378772 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W179980478 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1976256107 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1985692319 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1995005198 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W1997686450 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2000325452 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2011510903 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2014143330 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2020681875 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2021029443 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2027924793 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2033634508 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2034160833 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2041834973 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2042273921 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2044661514 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2057928029 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2058702147 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2059733285 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2064669570 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2066005581 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2067057032 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2081234327 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2102042584 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2109305774 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2113660575 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2114864810 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2115947602 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2118516436 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2130492998 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2134567940 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2148845226 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2153795488 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2158472660 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2166620483 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2167225740 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2168496996 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2169459420 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2229259675 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2239877442 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2338550940 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2369298188 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2539300584 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2560438049 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2567526052 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2586924019 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2599225410 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2618986735 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2802462847 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2804487239 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2809616712 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2894436594 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2924322406 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2943793267 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2961273870 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2963258403 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2973875029 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2978795816 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3005685045 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3035355209 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3043213632 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3090742562 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3118615836 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3119291271 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3133796347 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3136865286 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W3163585957 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W4237178762 @default.
- W4294190758 cites W2790129619 @default.
- W4294190758 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00442-4" @default.
- W4294190758 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36056368" @default.
- W4294190758 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4294190758 type Work @default.
- W4294190758 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W4294190758 countsByYear W42941907582022 @default.
- W4294190758 countsByYear W42941907582023 @default.
- W4294190758 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4294190758 hasAuthorship W4294190758A5009584483 @default.
- W4294190758 hasAuthorship W4294190758A5024999065 @default.
- W4294190758 hasAuthorship W4294190758A5028298318 @default.
- W4294190758 hasAuthorship W4294190758A5061608153 @default.
- W4294190758 hasAuthorship W4294190758A5069396108 @default.
- W4294190758 hasBestOaLocation W42941907581 @default.
- W4294190758 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4294190758 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4294190758 hasConcept C15744967 @default.