Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4294771857> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4294771857 endingPage "P09008" @default.
- W4294771857 startingPage "P09008" @default.
- W4294771857 abstract "Abstract Background: in this study, two proton beam delivery designs, i.e. passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and pencil beam scanning (PBS), were quantitatively compared in terms of dosimetric indices. The GATE Monte Carlo (MC) particle transport code was used to simulate the proton beam system; and the developed simulation engines were benchmarked with respect to the experimental measurements. Method: a water phantom was used to simulate system energy parameters using a set of depth-dose data in the energy range of 120–235 MeV. To compare the performance of PSPT against PBS, multiple dosimetric parameters including Bragg peak width (BP W 50 ), peak position, range, peak-to-entrance dose ratio, penumbra (90-10)% , penumbra (80-20)% , M 95% and dose volume histogram have been analyzed under the same conditions. Furthermore, the clinical test cases introduced by AAPM TG-119 were simulated in both beam delivery modes to compare the relevant clinical values obtained from Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) analysis. Results: the parametric comparison in the water phantom between the two techniques revealed that the value of peak-to-entrance dose ratio in PSPT is considerably higher than that from PBS by a factor of 8%. In addition, the BP_W50, penumbra (90-10)% , penumbra (80-20)% , and M 95% in PSPT was increased by a factor of 7, 51, 37, and 2.7%, respectively compared to the corresponding value obtained from PBS model. TG-119 phantom simulations showed that the difference of PTV mean dose between PBS and PSPT techniques are up to 1.8% while the difference of max dose to organ at risks (OARs) exceeds 50%. Conclusion: the results of this simulation show that although the passive scattering design method has a slightly higher ability to adjust the dose in target volume, but the active scanning proton therapy systems was superior in dose painting, and lower out-of-field dose compared to passive scattering design." @default.
- W4294771857 created "2022-09-06" @default.
- W4294771857 creator A5007891293 @default.
- W4294771857 creator A5036836472 @default.
- W4294771857 creator A5076362591 @default.
- W4294771857 creator A5085220942 @default.
- W4294771857 creator A5086297355 @default.
- W4294771857 date "2022-09-01" @default.
- W4294771857 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W4294771857 title "Comparative assessment of passive scattering and active scanning proton therapy techniques using Monte Carlo simulations" @default.
- W4294771857 cites W1508106691 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W1977288570 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W1978867862 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W1990713930 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W1997149306 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2018826659 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2025109572 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2037085069 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2044838925 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2048728929 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2050457793 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2052893104 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2053700561 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2058068517 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2073960553 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2075833875 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2076139133 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2080054127 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2086864012 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2116085429 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2120950852 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2130552208 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2138884296 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2141557237 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2960320388 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2969884311 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2973185503 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2990383016 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W3008672652 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W3047032880 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W3089027584 @default.
- W4294771857 cites W2158761583 @default.
- W4294771857 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/09/p09008" @default.
- W4294771857 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4294771857 type Work @default.
- W4294771857 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4294771857 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4294771857 hasAuthorship W4294771857A5007891293 @default.
- W4294771857 hasAuthorship W4294771857A5036836472 @default.
- W4294771857 hasAuthorship W4294771857A5076362591 @default.
- W4294771857 hasAuthorship W4294771857A5085220942 @default.
- W4294771857 hasAuthorship W4294771857A5086297355 @default.
- W4294771857 hasBestOaLocation W42947718572 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C2780198649 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C2780577055 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C2780944729 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C541997718 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C54516573 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C104293457 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C105795698 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C120665830 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C121332964 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C126838900 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C136229726 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C164705383 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C168834538 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C185544564 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C192562407 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C19499675 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C201645570 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C2779244869 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C2780198649 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C2780577055 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C2780944729 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C2989005 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C33923547 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C509974204 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C541997718 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C54516573 @default.
- W4294771857 hasConceptScore W4294771857C71924100 @default.
- W4294771857 hasIssue "09" @default.