FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4295367247> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4295367247 endingPage "624" @default.
• W4295367247 startingPage "616" @default.
• W4295367247 abstract "Abstract Introduction: The majority of pediatric medications are dosed according to weight and therefore accurate weight assessment is essential. However, this can be difficult in the unpredictable and peripatetic prehospital care setting, and medication errors are common. The Handtevy method and the Broselow tape are two systems designed to guide Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers in both pediatric patient weight estimation and medication dosing. The accuracy of the Handtevy method of weight estimation as practiced in the field by EMS has not been previously examined. Study Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine the field performance of the Handtevy method and the Broselow tape with respect to prehospital patient weight estimation. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of trauma and non-trauma patients transported by EMS to the emergency department (ED) of a quaternary care children’s hospital from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021. Demographic data, ED visit information, prehospital weight estimation, and medication dosing were collected and analyzed. Scale-based weight from the ED was used as the standard for comparison. Results: A total of 509 patients <13 years of age were included in this study. The EMS providers using the Broselow method estimated patient weight to within +/-10% of ED scale weight in 51.3% of patients. When using the Handtevy method, the EMS providers estimated patient weight to within +/-10% of ED scale weight in 43.7% of patients. When comparing the Handtevy versus Broselow method of prehospital weight estimation, there was no significant association between method and categorized weight discrepancy (over, under, or accurate estimates – defined as within 10% of ED scale weight; P = .25) or percent weight discrepancy (P = .75). On average, prehospital weight estimation was 6.33% lower than ED weight with use of the Handtevy method and 6.94% lower with use of the Broselow method. Conclusion: This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the use of the Handtevy or Broselow methods with respect to prehospital weight estimation. While further research is necessary, these results suggest similar field performance of the Broselow and Handtevy methods." @default.
• W4295367247 created "2022-09-13" @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5005759001 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5006375980 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5010121722 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5014182780 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5040826299 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5061132068 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5061462083 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5061842244 @default.
• W4295367247 creator A5070238945 @default.
• W4295367247 date "2022-09-13" @default.
• W4295367247 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4295367247 title "Weighty Matters: A Real-World Comparison of the Handtevy and Broselow Methods of Prehospital Weight Estimation" @default.
• W4295367247 cites W1988014770 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W1997188648 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2001025105 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2038735908 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2078546971 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2087484885 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2131225010 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2132156326 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2164578670 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2274512968 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2329799747 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2341511354 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2401402962 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2528569374 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2572090706 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2736047590 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2759429505 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W2955660865 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W3004704186 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W3041786386 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W4205434194 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W4226343654 @default.
• W4295367247 cites W3009492257 @default.
• W4295367247 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x22001248" @default.
• W4295367247 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36098467" @default.
• W4295367247 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4295367247 type Work @default.
• W4295367247 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4295367247 countsByYear W42953672472023 @default.
• W4295367247 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5005759001 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5006375980 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5010121722 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5014182780 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5040826299 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5061132068 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5061462083 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5061842244 @default.
• W4295367247 hasAuthorship W4295367247A5070238945 @default.
• W4295367247 hasBestOaLocation W42953672471 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C2777288759 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C3019530228 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C545288138 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C105795698 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C118552586 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C126322002 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C194828623 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C2777288759 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C2780724011 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C3019530228 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C33923547 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C545288138 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C545542383 @default.
• W4295367247 hasConceptScore W4295367247C71924100 @default.
• W4295367247 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4295367247 hasLocation W42953672471 @default.
• W4295367247 hasLocation W42953672472 @default.
• W4295367247 hasLocation W42953672473 @default.
• W4295367247 hasOpenAccess W4295367247 @default.
• W4295367247 hasPrimaryLocation W42953672471 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W2026095104 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W2216674862 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W2385902302 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W2531284920 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W2891824931 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W3045685395 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W3094648324 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W3159417240 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W3176987042 @default.
• W4295367247 hasRelatedWork W3210863890 @default.
• W4295367247 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W4295367247 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4295367247 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4295367247 workType "article" @default.