FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4295682196> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4295682196 endingPage "94" @default.
• W4295682196 startingPage "86" @default.
• W4295682196 abstract "Background: Epidural analgesia can be associated with high costs and postsurgical risks such as hypotension, despite its widespread use and value in providing opioid-sparing pain management. We tested the hypothesis that liposomal bupivacaine (LB) might be a reliable alternative to epidural analgesia in this real-world study. Objectives: To compare economic outcomes and hypotension incidence associated with use of LB and epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. Methods: This retrospective analysis identified records of adults who underwent abdominal surgeries between January 2016 and September 2019 with either LB administration or traditional epidural analgesia using the Premier Healthcare Database. Economic outcomes included length of stay, hospital costs, rates of discharge to home, and 30-day hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use. Subgroup analyses were stratified by surgical procedure (colorectal, abdominal) and approach (endoscopic, open). A generalized linear model adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics was used for all comparisons. Results: A total of 5799 surgical records (LB, n=4820; epidural analgesia, n=979) were included. Compared with cases where LB was administered, cases of epidural analgesia use were associated with a 1.6-day increase in length of stay (adjusted rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P<.0001) and $6304 greater hospital costs (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI], 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P<.0001). Cost differences were largely driven by room-and-board fees. Epidural analgesia was associated with reduced rates of discharge to home (P<.0001) and increased 30-day readmission rates (P=.0073) compared with LB. Epidural analgesia was also associated with increased rates of postsurgical hypotension (30% vs 11%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 2.8 [2.3-3.4]; P<.0001) and vasopressor use (22% vs 7%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 3.1 [2.5-4.0]; P<.0001) compared with LB. Subgroup analyses by surgical procedure and approach were generally consistent with overall comparisons. Discussion: Our results are consistent with previous studies that demonstrated epidural analgesia can be associated with higher utilization of healthcare resources and complications compared with LB. Conclusions: Compared with epidural analgesia, LB was associated with economic benefits and reduced incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use." @default.
• W4295682196 created "2022-09-14" @default.
• W4295682196 creator A5000203747 @default.
• W4295682196 creator A5055465515 @default.
• W4295682196 creator A5056041496 @default.
• W4295682196 creator A5058631145 @default.
• W4295682196 date "2022-09-14" @default.
• W4295682196 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4295682196 title "Economic Outcomes and Incidence of Postsurgical Hypotension With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries" @default.
• W4295682196 cites W1968256510 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W1986056295 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2056956354 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2062424500 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2072695344 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2086332805 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2090704647 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2109092573 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2114010195 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2121656227 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2162845029 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2336308815 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2346727939 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2597140783 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2606835068 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2607168684 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2794094817 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2802338427 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2810970946 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2890103696 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2896087646 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2896247934 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W2918340326 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3007021921 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3021182848 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3083886274 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3111052052 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3155726092 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W3156734965 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W4200586980 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W4211229530 @default.
• W4295682196 cites W4299689471 @default.
• W4295682196 doi "https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2022.37739" @default.
• W4295682196 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4295682196 type Work @default.
• W4295682196 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4295682196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4295682196 hasAuthorship W4295682196A5000203747 @default.
• W4295682196 hasAuthorship W4295682196A5055465515 @default.
• W4295682196 hasAuthorship W4295682196A5056041496 @default.
• W4295682196 hasAuthorship W4295682196A5058631145 @default.
• W4295682196 hasBestOaLocation W42956821961 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C2781328992 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C120665830 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C121332964 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C126322002 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C141071460 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C167135981 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C2780120127 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C2781328992 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C42219234 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C44249647 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C61511704 @default.
• W4295682196 hasConceptScore W4295682196C71924100 @default.
• W4295682196 hasLocation W42956821961 @default.
• W4295682196 hasOpenAccess W4295682196 @default.
• W4295682196 hasPrimaryLocation W42956821961 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W1969974057 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W1991846282 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2080090434 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W4283770534 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W4381196952 @default.
• W4295682196 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W4295682196 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4295682196 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4295682196 workType "article" @default.