Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4295693642> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4295693642 endingPage "2647" @default.
- W4295693642 startingPage "2630" @default.
- W4295693642 abstract "Abstract This study undertook a head‐to‐head comparison of best‐worst, best‐best and ranking discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to help decide which method to use if moving beyond traditional single‐best DCEs. Respondents were randomized to one of three preference elicitation methods. Rank‐ordered (exploded) mixed logit models and respondent‐reported data were used to compare methods and first and second choices. First choices differed from second choices and preferences differed between elicitation methods, even beyond scale and scale dynamics. First choices of best‐worst had good choice consistency, scale dynamics and statistical efficiency, but this method's second choices performed worst. Ranking performed best on respondent‐reported difficulty and preference; best‐best's second choices on statistical efficiency. All three preference elicitation methods improve efficiency of data collection relative to using first choices only. However, differences in preferences between first and second choices challenge moving beyond single‐best DCE. If nevertheless doing so, best‐best and ranking are preferred over best‐worst DCE." @default.
- W4295693642 created "2022-09-14" @default.
- W4295693642 creator A5017554270 @default.
- W4295693642 creator A5033508635 @default.
- W4295693642 creator A5054087043 @default.
- W4295693642 creator A5084123726 @default.
- W4295693642 date "2022-09-14" @default.
- W4295693642 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W4295693642 title "Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?" @default.
- W4295693642 cites W123430343 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W1509766507 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W1968097274 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W1974674066 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W1990821421 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W1999984639 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2005910945 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2022421635 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2024717777 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2044817941 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2046425032 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2047028789 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2049390752 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2060950183 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2065485420 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2086670988 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2088424126 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2100024374 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2102100609 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2111016644 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2121722424 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2122707212 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2131877475 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2132095645 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2150301729 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2244280360 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2320592915 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2491700952 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2734180142 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2895773179 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2897358932 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2909224716 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2912990240 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2953602043 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2966047233 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W2995215155 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W3037347642 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W3039667227 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W3129487879 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W3184001905 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W3209699223 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W4242920820 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W4295693642 @default.
- W4295693642 cites W4296148530 @default.
- W4295693642 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4599" @default.
- W4295693642 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36102864" @default.
- W4295693642 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4295693642 type Work @default.
- W4295693642 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W4295693642 countsByYear W42956936422022 @default.
- W4295693642 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4295693642 hasAuthorship W4295693642A5017554270 @default.
- W4295693642 hasAuthorship W4295693642A5033508635 @default.
- W4295693642 hasAuthorship W4295693642A5054087043 @default.
- W4295693642 hasAuthorship W4295693642A5084123726 @default.
- W4295693642 hasBestOaLocation W42956936422 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C164226766 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C2777868144 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConcept C95057490 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C105795698 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C114614502 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C119857082 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C121332964 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C149782125 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C151956035 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C154945302 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C162324750 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C164226766 @default.
- W4295693642 hasConceptScore W4295693642C17744445 @default.