FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296281379> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4296281379 endingPage "92" @default.
• W4296281379 startingPage "80" @default.
• W4296281379 abstract "The subject. The author studies models of tax administration. The purpose of the article is to confirm or refute hypothesis that successful tax administration strategy consists a balanced combination of tax enforcement measures and positive incentives. The methodology of the study includes content analysis of the scientific papers prepared by European and American lawyers and economists. The main results , scope of application. Tax compliance is an essential component of a wellfunctioning tax system. The forms and methods by which states ensure tax compliance, and taxpayers try to avoid paying taxes, change significantly over time, due to the modernization of tax policy, changes in the alignment and transformation of economic forces, institutions, norms and technologies, Historically, tax relations have always been strictly vertical and hierarchical, relying on administrative-command methods of tax administration, and also characterized by retrospective tax audits and the threat of imposing harsh sanctions to ensure tax compliance. The one-sided nature and lack of flexibility of such a model, limited by the triad of regulatory instruments “obligation – control – responsibility”, was initially subjected to comprehensive criticism in the scientific community. Revolutionary transformations in public administration practice have an impact on all aspects of tax interactions, including tax compliance and tax administration. The global trend lies in the understanding that tax administration, in essence, should be expressed not in the confrontation between taxpayers and tax authorities, but in their dialogue, interaction and cooperation. The flexible tax administration model is based on new approaches to public administration based on a shift in emphasis from coercion to persuasion, from rigidity to flexibility, from “reactivity” to “proactivity”, from “influence” to “interaction” between managers and those controlled. Today, fiscal authorities are encouraged to adhere to a «cooperative approach» in dealing with taxpayers, based on principles such as dialogue, mutual understanding, impartiality, reciprocity, transparency, compromise and flexible response. At the same time, law-abiding behavior should be encouraged in every possible way, and unlawful behavior should be subject to increased discouragement. The doctrine of flexible tax administration advocates the development of trust in the relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities, offering the latter a wide range of tools to ensure tax compliance, and not limited to control and sanctions. The main mission of the state is to encourage taxpayers to partner with fiscal authorities and to voluntary compliance. For any state, the most desirable situation is the voluntary fulfillment of tax obligations by all participants in tax interactions, which makes it possible to minimize the size of the tax gap. Both persuasion and coercion as methods of tax administration have their pros and cons. Therefore, the key to a successful tax administration strategy is not abandoning one method in favor of another, but combining them in a balanced manner so that both methods cumulatively complement each other. Conclusions. In order to effectively increase the level of tax compliance, it is necessary to use a comprehensive tax-legal, organizational and informational toolkit, including both tax enforcement measures demonstrating the tax administration's determination to ensure tax compliance on the part of tax violators, and measures of positive incentives and rewards oriented for service support of law-abiding and conscientious taxpayers." @default.
• W4296281379 created "2022-09-19" @default.
• W4296281379 creator A5029896301 @default.
• W4296281379 date "2022-06-21" @default.
• W4296281379 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4296281379 title "Responsive tax administration model and tax compliance" @default.
• W4296281379 cites W1975259537 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W1980114718 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2021197318 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2088663850 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2097029552 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2143201948 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2145342896 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2161877058 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2784973042 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W2808470055 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W3122018254 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W3122051684 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W3124188638 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W3125995291 @default.
• W4296281379 cites W3126025571 @default.
• W4296281379 doi "https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).80-92" @default.
• W4296281379 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4296281379 type Work @default.
• W4296281379 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4296281379 countsByYear W42962813792022 @default.
• W4296281379 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4296281379 hasAuthorship W4296281379A5029896301 @default.
• W4296281379 hasBestOaLocation W42962813791 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C111326686 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C113216237 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C162077342 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C193681711 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C51303962 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C514942387 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConcept C55214782 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C100001284 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C111326686 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C113216237 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C121955636 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C144133560 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C162077342 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C162324750 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C190253527 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C193681711 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C51303962 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C514942387 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C551662922 @default.
• W4296281379 hasConceptScore W4296281379C55214782 @default.
• W4296281379 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4296281379 hasLocation W42962813791 @default.
• W4296281379 hasOpenAccess W4296281379 @default.
• W4296281379 hasPrimaryLocation W42962813791 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W1523592937 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W2173289889 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W2184312090 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W2605848297 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W2618900121 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W3122293940 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W3145422484 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W4205962952 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W4319870770 @default.
• W4296281379 hasRelatedWork W4382562924 @default.
• W4296281379 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4296281379 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4296281379 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4296281379 workType "article" @default.