FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296351369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4296351369 endingPage "239" @default.
• W4296351369 startingPage "224" @default.
• W4296351369 abstract "The subject. The study is devoted to the study of corruption aspect of criminal prosecution of entrepreneurs in Russia. The aim of this paper is to identify typical corrupt practices in the criminal prosecution of entrepreneurs, to investigate their causes, as well as to formulate recommendations for minimizing the identified practices of abuse. The methodology. The author analyzes the cases of criminal prosecution of entrepreneurs who have filed appeals to the Center for Public Procedures Business Against Corruption, the Center Protection of Business. These public platforms act as filters of appeals for unwarranted criminal prosecution. In case of confirmation of the facts of illegal use of criminal law instruments in relation to an entrepreneur, the appeal with the attached expertise is sent to the Commissioner for the Protection of Entrepreneurs' Rights. The main results, scope of application. To corrupt practices in the field of criminal prosecution of entrepreneurs the author included the following: unreasonable use of preventive measures in the form of detention in contravention of the direct prohibition of pt. 1.1 of the art. 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation; ignoring the fact of committing a crime in the field of business and as a consequence qualification of the crime not by special business, but by common crimes; superficial preliminary investigation, resulting in criminal proceedings without due cause; ignoring the prejudicial facts established by arbitration courts in criminal proceedings; unreasonable imputing the commission of an intentional act. The reasons for the corrupt practices highlighted and investigated by the author are such factors as the wording of the law and its interpretation, limitations and imprecision of the law, allowing discretion on the part of law enforcers; the established KPIs of law enforcement agencies that encourage the pursuit of performance and accusatory bias; declarative ethical standards adopted by public authorities and companies, i.e. the lack of effectively implemented instruments of integrity management; low level of public control over criminal proceedings. In order to minimize the above practices, it is necessary to further improve regulations, to stimulate ethical regulation in organizations; to modernize the metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, focusing on non-departmental parameters; to significantly increase the role of the institution of business ombudsman as an additional guarantor of legal rights and interests of entrepreneurs, and to actively introduce digitalization tools, in particular, digital records of criminal cases. It is important to emphasize again that the author does not claim to cover all possible corrupt practices in the prosecution of entrepreneurs and their causes. For example, there is a vicious practice of reclassifying a witness in a criminal case after testifying as a suspect and subsequently as a defendant. Further research could look in more detail at each of these corrupt practices, identify and analyze additional practices, as well as explore opportunities for their mitigation. From the point of view of the applied implementation of the results of the study, it seems that they can be useful, on the one hand, to decision makers when improving criminal policy towards entrepreneurs, but also to entrepreneurs themselves to understand the potential criminal law risks that they may face and must minimize." @default.
• W4296351369 created "2022-09-20" @default.
• W4296351369 creator A5050643884 @default.
• W4296351369 date "2022-09-19" @default.
• W4296351369 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4296351369 title "Typical corrupt practices in the criminal prosecution of businessmen" @default.
• W4296351369 cites W1604752048 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2007319948 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2543714370 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2897870387 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2914599199 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2937325841 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2959482195 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2980430686 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W2983674449 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3016374025 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3039186609 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3044527243 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3096092189 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3108599954 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3115387088 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3131359240 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3157930195 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W3178178648 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W4240502594 @default.
• W4296351369 cites W4312436956 @default.
• W4296351369 doi "https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(3).224-239" @default.
• W4296351369 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4296351369 type Work @default.
• W4296351369 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4296351369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4296351369 hasAuthorship W4296351369A5050643884 @default.
• W4296351369 hasBestOaLocation W42963513691 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C117660856 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C2780027415 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C504945742 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C117660856 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C124952713 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C142362112 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C144024400 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C144133560 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C161191863 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C17744445 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C199539241 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C202565627 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C2777855551 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C2778449503 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C2780027415 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C41008148 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C504945742 @default.
• W4296351369 hasConceptScore W4296351369C73484699 @default.
• W4296351369 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4296351369 hasLocation W42963513691 @default.
• W4296351369 hasOpenAccess W4296351369 @default.
• W4296351369 hasPrimaryLocation W42963513691 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W2026534948 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W2354534303 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W2370397245 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W2390197298 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W2394480715 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W3126285129 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W4291586352 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W4315864944 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W626147318 @default.
• W4296351369 hasRelatedWork W191408326 @default.
• W4296351369 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4296351369 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4296351369 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4296351369 workType "article" @default.