FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296639131> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4296639131 endingPage "128474" @default.
• W4296639131 startingPage "128474" @default.
• W4296639131 abstract "Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) measurements are fundamental for improving the understanding of water-energy related processes and for validating model simulations. However, ET is inherently difficult to measure unambiguously. The surface renewal (SR) method, which describes the turbulence exchange process from a new perspective, has been successfully applied within affordable costs from crops to tall forest canopies. However, the SR method, with its significant practical potential, remains uncommon in measuring ET, likely because a semiempirical calibration coefficient (α) is needed. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of the SR method without any calibration, and compares ET measurements between the SR and Bowen ratio (BR) methods to test which method is more robust. The results from a two-year experiment at an arid vineyard show the following factors: 1) Daily ET estimates by the SR method (ET_SR) without calibration (α = 1) agree well with those from the BR method (ET_BR), with determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) values of 0.83, 0.41 mm/d, 0.57 mm/d, and 22.22 %, respectively; 2) Compared to ET_BR, ET_SR values calibrated using a α of 1.2 (ET_SR∣α=1.2) contained the least error in terms of MAE (0.38 mm/d) and MAPE (19.64 %), followed by ET_SR∣α=1.3 and ET_SR∣α=1.1 without a significant difference; 3) ET_BR measurements were affected by abnormal BR value rejection criteria with wider rejection ranges associated with more significant differences between the ET_BR and ET_SR measurements; and 4) 61 % of BR values calculated from the SR-based fluxes were distributed in the range of −1 ∼ 1, whereas a maximum of 43 % were in the same range based on BR measurements under various abnormal BR rejection criteria. For the studied grapevine canopies, the uncalibrated SR method is more robust than the BR method, and it is easy, economic, and accurate for practical application." @default.
• W4296639131 created "2022-09-23" @default.
• W4296639131 creator A5007719342 @default.
• W4296639131 creator A5014053320 @default.
• W4296639131 creator A5065220600 @default.
• W4296639131 creator A5080102032 @default.
• W4296639131 date "2022-10-01" @default.
• W4296639131 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4296639131 title "Comparison of surface renewal and Bowen ratio derived evapotranspiration measurements in an arid vineyard" @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1675837087 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1964499456 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1964677616 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1965609624 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1966806176 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W1985722055 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2005587897 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2020045714 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2023781289 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2032993224 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2033904036 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2041469886 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2048674655 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2055862757 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2065535077 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2074082212 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2076640067 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2082586262 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2093461609 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2106550726 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2110640263 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2115672883 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2128288508 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2141748334 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2154869568 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2158370478 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2158695073 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2162719469 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2166186402 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2167453193 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2191241940 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2591003161 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2592541999 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2770947207 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2798019963 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2807642687 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2885992586 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2901760573 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2918120229 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2954455471 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W2979593185 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W3031669092 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W4200260306 @default.
• W4296639131 cites W4210370286 @default.
• W4296639131 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128474" @default.
• W4296639131 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4296639131 type Work @default.
• W4296639131 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4296639131 countsByYear W42966391312023 @default.
• W4296639131 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4296639131 hasAuthorship W4296639131A5007719342 @default.
• W4296639131 hasAuthorship W4296639131A5014053320 @default.
• W4296639131 hasAuthorship W4296639131A5065220600 @default.
• W4296639131 hasAuthorship W4296639131A5080102032 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C128990827 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C139945424 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C150217764 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C150772632 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C176783924 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C188154048 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C2780924976 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConcept C91586092 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C105795698 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C121332964 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C127313418 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C128990827 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C139945424 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C150217764 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C150772632 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C151730666 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C165838908 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C166957645 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C176783924 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C188154048 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C18903297 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C205649164 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C2780924976 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C33923547 @default.
• W4296639131 hasConceptScore W4296639131C86803240 @default.

• next