Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296657470> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4296657470 endingPage "8" @default.
- W4296657470 startingPage "1" @default.
- W4296657470 abstract "Interviews are commonly used to select applicants for medical school, residency, and fellowship. However, interview techniques vary in acceptability, feasibility, reliability, and validity. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of different interview methods in selecting the best qualified applicants for admission to medical school and developed a logic model to implement best practices for interviewing.Five electronic literature databases were searched for comparative studies related to interviewing in medical schools from inception through February 1, 2021. Inclusion criteria included publications in English that compared different methods of conducting a selection interview in medical schools with a controlled trial design. General study characteristics, measurement methodologies, and outcomes were reviewed. Quality appraisal was performed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and the Oxford Risk of Bias Scale. Based on these findings, a logic model was constructed using content analysis.Thirteen studies were included. The multiple mini-interview (MMI) was reliable, unbiased, and predicted clinical and academic performance; the virtual MMI increased reliability and lowered costs. For unstructured interviews, blinding interviewers to academic scores reduced bias towards higher scorers; student and faculty interviewers rated applicants similarly. Applicants preferred structured over unstructured interviews. Study quality was above average per the MERSQI, risk of bias was high per the Oxford scale, and between-study heterogeneity was substantial.There were few high-quality studies on interviewing applicants for admission to medical school; the MMI appears to offer a reliable method of interviewing. A logic model can provide a conceptual framework for conducting evidence-based admissions interviews." @default.
- W4296657470 created "2022-09-23" @default.
- W4296657470 creator A5001546493 @default.
- W4296657470 creator A5001574727 @default.
- W4296657470 creator A5014643117 @default.
- W4296657470 creator A5040636401 @default.
- W4296657470 date "2022-09-22" @default.
- W4296657470 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4296657470 title "Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review" @default.
- W4296657470 cites W1558712372 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W1931666305 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W1982402438 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2016188851 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2025009189 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2025530803 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2031306683 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2037900392 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2038227228 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2039065426 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2039876160 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2040198887 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2051596482 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2070360485 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2079669378 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2082570042 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2083214946 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2093080048 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2094237992 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2104675861 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2111656868 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2124941788 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2132566343 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2133275757 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2133860760 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2135400982 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2140015094 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2144418705 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2162186823 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2165832562 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2175635532 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2202731635 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2289170923 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2329538042 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2344718142 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2461631543 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2554301718 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2613175776 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W2788306452 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W3016226984 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W3102154137 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W3117756349 @default.
- W4296657470 cites W3123042418 @default.
- W4296657470 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00726-8" @default.
- W4296657470 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36136234" @default.
- W4296657470 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4296657470 type Work @default.
- W4296657470 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W4296657470 countsByYear W42966574702022 @default.
- W4296657470 countsByYear W42966574702023 @default.
- W4296657470 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4296657470 hasAuthorship W4296657470A5001546493 @default.
- W4296657470 hasAuthorship W4296657470A5001574727 @default.
- W4296657470 hasAuthorship W4296657470A5014643117 @default.
- W4296657470 hasAuthorship W4296657470A5040636401 @default.
- W4296657470 hasBestOaLocation W42966574701 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C24845683 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C2771230 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C2993838110 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConceptScore W4296657470C109359841 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConceptScore W4296657470C111472728 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConceptScore W4296657470C121332964 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConceptScore W4296657470C138496976 @default.
- W4296657470 hasConceptScore W4296657470C138885662 @default.