FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296691018> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4296691018 endingPage "1045" @default.
• W4296691018 startingPage "1045" @default.
• W4296691018 abstract "Importance A bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) can help compare the various types of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in clinical practice. Objective To compare outcomes of presbyopia-correcting IOLs frequently recommended in clinical practice through a bayesian NMA based on a systematic review. Data Sources Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched on May 15, 2021, from inception. Study Selection Based on the research question, randomized clinical trials assessing multifocal IOLs in patients who underwent bilateral cataract extraction were searched. Nonrandomized studies, studies in patients with unilateral or contralateral cataract extractions, duplicated studies, conference abstracts, and nonpeer-reviewed articles were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis Descriptive statistics and outcomes were extracted. The NMA was conducted to compare different types of IOLs. The mean differences for continuous variables, odds ratios for binary variables, 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and ranks of interventions were estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcomes examined included binocular visual acuities by distance and optical quality, including glare, halos, and spectacle independence. Results This NMA included 27 studies comprising 2605 patients. For uncorrected near visual acuity, trifocal IOLs (mean difference, −0.32 [95% CrI, −0.46 to −0.19]) and old bifocal diffractive IOLs (mean difference, −0.33 [95% CrI, −0.50 to −0.14]) afforded better visual acuity than monofocal IOLs. Regarding uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, extended depth-of-focus IOLs provided better visual acuity than monofocal IOLs. However, there were no differences between extended depth-of-focus and trifocal diffractive IOLs in pairwise comparisons. For uncorrected distant visual acuity, all multifocal IOLs were comparable with monofocal IOLs. There were no statistical differences between multifocal and monofocal IOLs regarding contrast sensitivity, glare, or halos. Conclusions and Relevance For patients considering a multifocal IOL due to presbyopia, bilateral implantation of a trifocal IOL might be an optimal option for patients without compromising distant visual acuity." @default.
• W4296691018 created "2022-09-23" @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5007127998 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5007451796 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5007744446 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5016450375 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5029285441 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5042226219 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5051392475 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5051908373 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5066328758 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5076692943 @default.
• W4296691018 creator A5082615841 @default.
• W4296691018 date "2022-11-01" @default.
• W4296691018 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4296691018 title "Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Accommodative, Multifocal, Extended Depth-of-Focus, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopia-Correcting Cataract Surgery" @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1518719782 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1907843894 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1964498463 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1971593497 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1984344473 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W1996691191 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2000248637 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2010771597 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2015400820 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2025485438 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2053917419 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2079960568 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2103363990 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2108529069 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2120822316 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2135521941 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2147865648 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2182271449 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2274824853 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2341432675 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2440399493 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2531624664 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2595966482 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2763948558 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2767487438 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2801651911 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2808906772 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2887075751 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2894684636 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2908969710 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2921782399 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2931425522 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W2981452012 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3002342101 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3005067757 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3014657521 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3033106478 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3037338782 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3084721097 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3088804514 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3123893780 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W3139284531 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4236315489 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4236405267 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4246667971 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4250142692 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4253662919 @default.
• W4296691018 cites W4285698150 @default.
• W4296691018 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667" @default.
• W4296691018 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36136323" @default.
• W4296691018 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4296691018 type Work @default.
• W4296691018 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W4296691018 countsByYear W42966910182022 @default.
• W4296691018 countsByYear W42966910182023 @default.
• W4296691018 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5007127998 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5007451796 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5007744446 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5016450375 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5029285441 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5042226219 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5051392475 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5051908373 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5066328758 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5076692943 @default.
• W4296691018 hasAuthorship W4296691018A5082615841 @default.
• W4296691018 hasBestOaLocation W42966910181 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C194130854 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2775888743 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2777582095 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2779909278 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C2781104129 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4296691018 hasConceptScore W4296691018C118487528 @default.

• next