FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4296709749> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4296709749 endingPage "238008442211240" @default.
• W4296709749 startingPage "238008442211240" @default.
• W4296709749 abstract "Introduction: Single-implant mandibular overdentures (SIMOs) are one of the least invasive implant treatments for edentulism. The new Novaloc attachment system can improve the clinical performance of implant-retained overdentures but has not been tested for SIMOs. Objectives: To compare Novaloc and a gold standard system (Locator) for SIMOs in an edentate elderly population in terms of patient-reported outcomes and device- and treatment-related complications. Methods: In this single-center crossover randomized clinical trial (RCT), 10 edentulous participants received an implant in the lower midline and had their lower complete dentures converted to SIMOs. The participants received each attachment system for 3 mo in a randomized order, followed by measurement of patient satisfaction and oral health–related quality of life via the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous People questionnaire, respectively. Complications were registered throughout the RCT. Patients were interviewed for their experiences with SIMOs and preference for one of the attachment systems. Quantitative analysis employed mixed linear models and chi-square tests (α = 0.05), whereas interview data underwent thematic analysis and, in turn, integration into quantitative data (mixed methods explanatory design). Results: All 10 randomized participants completed the trial. Mean ± SD general satisfaction was 92% ± 8% with Novaloc versus 85% ± 13% with Locator (mean difference, 9%; 95% CI, 1% to 17%). For specific McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire items, only denture stability was significantly increased for Novaloc. Seven participants preferred Novaloc over Locator at the end of the RCT (chi-square, P = 0.045). No difference was found between the attachments in terms of oral health–related quality of life based on the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous People and complications. Thematic analysis revealed high patient satisfaction with SIMOs, with denture stability the main criterion for their satisfaction and attachment preference. Conclusion: Among elderly edentulous patients wearing SIMOs, Novaloc led to increased patient satisfaction and preference. Better patient-perceived denture stability may explain this result. The attachment systems exhibited similar short-term maintenance needs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03126942 (first registered on April 13, 2017). Secondary identifiers: A03-M07-17A (McGill University, Institutional Review Board) and 2018-3873 (McGill University Health Centre, Research Ethics Board). Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this mixed methods study can be used by clinicians when choosing which attachment system to use for SIMOs. Results suggest that edentulous patients prefer attachments with a better-defined seating position, such as that of the Novaloc system, as opposed to the nylon matrix on metallic abutment of the Locator system." @default.
• W4296709749 created "2022-09-23" @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5008832075 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5011413838 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5011897686 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5017148092 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5049424000 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5049785437 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5052414523 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5075039138 @default.
• W4296709749 creator A5089036430 @default.
• W4296709749 date "2022-09-20" @default.
• W4296709749 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4296709749 title "Single-Implant Overdentures Retained by a Novel Attachment: A Mixed Methods Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial" @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1489472797 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1646799590 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1749313700 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1958878591 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1974194742 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2016488533 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2018164331 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2024816949 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2029306805 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2038169747 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2057927555 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2058761057 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2064930549 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2070309415 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2088348313 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2091919881 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2110388434 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2115279296 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2119905322 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2129519201 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2133990032 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2134120248 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2134467377 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2147687290 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2331770093 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2411902498 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2765716436 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W2806909915 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W3031540264 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W3034268469 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W3047375613 @default.
• W4296709749 cites W3047990916 @default.
• W4296709749 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221124083" @default.
• W4296709749 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36127832" @default.
• W4296709749 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4296709749 type Work @default.
• W4296709749 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4296709749 countsByYear W42967097492023 @default.
• W4296709749 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5008832075 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5011413838 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5011897686 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5017148092 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5049424000 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5049785437 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5052414523 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5075039138 @default.
• W4296709749 hasAuthorship W4296709749A5089036430 @default.
• W4296709749 hasBestOaLocation W42967097491 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2777576356 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2780062004 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C2992672162 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C87813604 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C141071460 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C142724271 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C168563851 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C199343813 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C204787440 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C27081682 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2775944032 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2777576356 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2780062004 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2781411149 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2908647359 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C2992672162 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C71924100 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C87813604 @default.
• W4296709749 hasConceptScore W4296709749C99454951 @default.
• W4296709749 hasFunder F4320327394 @default.
• W4296709749 hasFunder F4320334618 @default.
• W4296709749 hasLocation W42967097491 @default.
• W4296709749 hasLocation W42967097492 @default.

• next