FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4297216022> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4297216022 endingPage "108" @default.
• W4297216022 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4297216022 abstract "Background Primary care networks are groups of general practices brought together in July 2019 to hold shared budgets and develop new services in response to NHS England (now NHS England and Improvement) policy. This study examined the early implementation of primary care networks, especially what has helped or hindered progress, how they operate in relation to pre-existing collaborations and issues for rural networks. Objective To produce early evidence about the development of primary care networks to inform policy for their future development. Our research questions were to investigate (1) the contextual background of primary care networks; (2) the rationale for general practices to enter into collaborations; (3) the early learning from establishing primary care networks; (4) barriers to and facilitators of effective collaboration across general practices; and (5) the likely future progress of primary care networks in the English NHS, including in the light of COVID-19. Design A qualitative cross-comparative case study evaluation comprised four work packages: (1) a rapid evidence assessment; (2) a workshop with academics, policy experts and patient/public representatives; (3) interviews with stakeholders, observations of meetings, a survey and documentary analysis across four case study sites; and (4) analysis and synthesis of findings to develop recommendations for the next stage of the development of primary care networks. Results Primary care networks have been implemented in a timely manner and have established a range of new local health services. Previous general practice collaborations provide much-needed support in terms of management, leadership and infrastructure, although they can be a source of tension within networks where interests, goals and ways of working do not align. Reasons for collaborative working typically focus on the sustainability of primary care and a desire for better-integrated services, although those cited as the basis for joining primary care networks were mostly related to policy and financial incentives. Early evidence reveals operational success in establishing organisational structures, recruiting to new roles and providing services as required by the national specification. Effective management and leadership, particularly with respect to having a committed clinical director, and constructive relationships between primary care networks and clinical commissioning groups, are important in ensuring success. In rural areas there was some perceived lack of fit with aspects of the primary care network specification, alongside existing challenges of providing primary care to rural populations. Limitations Arranging and carrying out interviews proved difficult given the workload associated with implementing networks and wider time pressures. Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the team was unable to undertake planned face-to-face workshops to explore findings. Given that primary care networks were in their first year of operation at the time of this evaluation, we were cautious in drawing definitive conclusions. Conclusions Key lessons focus on increasing the engagement of general practices and wider primary care teams with networks; building leadership and management capacity to support networks in fulfilling their contractual obligations and meeting local health needs; and clarifying how primary care networks will operate in the post-COVID-19 health and social care system. Future work Future work could involve evaluating the impact and effectiveness of primary care networks using quantitative and qualitative measures; undertaking research in both rural and urban areas, exploring the extent to which this context is significant; examining the cost and effectiveness of sustaining and extending leadership and management support within primary care networks; and understanding the relationships between primary care networks and the wider health and care system. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018110790. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research ; Vol. 10, No. 27. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information." @default.
• W4297216022 created "2022-09-28" @default.
• W4297216022 creator A5006386566 @default.
• W4297216022 creator A5042211146 @default.
• W4297216022 creator A5042788270 @default.
• W4297216022 creator A5044644120 @default.
• W4297216022 date "2022-09-01" @default.
• W4297216022 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4297216022 title "Early evidence of the development of primary care networks in England: a rapid evaluation study" @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1520937842 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1544133109 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1780778418 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1967837690 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1975976115 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1976770755 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1982482798 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W1999503346 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2011622796 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2011811712 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2016243087 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2016656189 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2024891408 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2028338090 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2049910686 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2049975166 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2059313314 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2060831471 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2085706588 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2088016058 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2108618312 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2116270097 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2118847637 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2120024873 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2126522483 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2135133609 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2157703262 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2168592755 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2257811149 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2409425970 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2411249330 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2413616862 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2468231723 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2472744439 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2567362164 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2603913628 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2626609970 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2734323360 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2751916039 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2755415217 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2800322972 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2801614849 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2809153412 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2809979198 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2891195665 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2899926213 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2967654273 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W2996207343 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W4205303265 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W4206131636 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W4376848789 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W621575673 @default.
• W4297216022 cites W3024783741 @default.
• W4297216022 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/gbuo3259" @default.
• W4297216022 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4297216022 type Work @default.
• W4297216022 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4297216022 countsByYear W42972160222022 @default.
• W4297216022 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4297216022 hasAuthorship W4297216022A5006386566 @default.
• W4297216022 hasAuthorship W4297216022A5042211146 @default.
• W4297216022 hasAuthorship W4297216022A5042788270 @default.
• W4297216022 hasAuthorship W4297216022A5044644120 @default.
• W4297216022 hasBestOaLocation W42972160221 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C127413603 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C159110408 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C17744445 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C18762648 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C2984752397 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C39549134 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C509550671 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C512399662 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C71924100 @default.
• W4297216022 hasConceptScore W4297216022C78519656 @default.
• W4297216022 hasFunder F4320334785 @default.
• W4297216022 hasIssue "27" @default.
• W4297216022 hasLocation W42972160221 @default.
• W4297216022 hasOpenAccess W4297216022 @default.

• next