FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4297548944> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4297548944 abstract "To compare the initial success rate, feasibility, and effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) for anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation (LT).We retrospectively analyzed the data collected during January 2015 to December 2021 from liver transplantation recipients who developed anastomotic biliary stricture after liver transplantation and treated by ERCP and/or PTC. The success rate, complications and patients' survival rate of ERCP and PTC procedures was evaluated.Forty-eight patients who underwent LT and were confirmed to have the anastomotic biliary stricture were enrolled. Overall, 48/48 patients underwent single or multiple ERCP procedures as the first line therapy; 121 therapeutic ERCPs (3.36 ± 2.53 ERCPs per patient) were performed in 36/48 patients successfully. All the 12 patients who failed ERCP tend to have special bile duct conditions such as overlong, angle shaped, and/or extremely narrowed bile duct and underwent PTC as an alternative treatment. The initial success rate of ERCP was 75% (36/48) while the success rate of ERCP for the 12 patients with special bile duct was 0% (0/12). PTC was an effective second-line treatment for those 12 patients who failed ERCP, and 58.33% (7 of 12 cases) were treated successfully. The average procedure time in PTC group was significantly lower than ERCP group (t=2.292, P=0.027). The feasibility of ERCP was associated with the anatomical shape of bile duct and the severity of the stricture site. Finally, the cumulative survival rate was 100% (12/12) in PTC group compared to 86.11% (31/36) in ERCP group (χ2 = 0.670, P=0.413).ERCP is the gold standard method for the diagnosis and effective intervention for the management of biliary complications after LT. However, its use in certain types of biliary complications (e.g., patients with severe anastomotic biliary stricture and those with overlong and angle shaped bile ducts) is not promising and associated with significant risk of complications. PTC and other interventions should be studied along with ERCP for patients for whom ERCP may not work. The feasibility and efficacy of primary management can be predicted by the noninvasive imaging examinations like Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) before the procedure, which may help with the choice of the most reasonable therapeutic modality and avoiding unnecessary financial burden and complications." @default.
• W4297548944 created "2022-09-29" @default.
• W4297548944 creator A5021275847 @default.
• W4297548944 creator A5031659624 @default.
• W4297548944 creator A5051260759 @default.
• W4297548944 creator A5072880385 @default.
• W4297548944 creator A5085203241 @default.
• W4297548944 date "2022-09-29" @default.
• W4297548944 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4297548944 title "The reasonable therapeutic modality for biliary duct-to-duct anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation: ERCP or PTC?" @default.
• W4297548944 cites W1974791348 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W1976607622 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W1996758114 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2006194865 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2025458886 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2034774277 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2038723676 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2067050693 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2068104237 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2122841715 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2133710652 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2140140012 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2150328900 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2150433939 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2176290808 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2256205816 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2412225456 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2413256535 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2419637238 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2486348905 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2495298461 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2520072255 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2912940843 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2946251380 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2948095989 @default.
• W4297548944 cites W2980721505 @default.
• W4297548944 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1035722" @default.
• W4297548944 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36249014" @default.
• W4297548944 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4297548944 type Work @default.
• W4297548944 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4297548944 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4297548944 hasAuthorship W4297548944A5021275847 @default.
• W4297548944 hasAuthorship W4297548944A5031659624 @default.
• W4297548944 hasAuthorship W4297548944A5051260759 @default.
• W4297548944 hasAuthorship W4297548944A5072880385 @default.
• W4297548944 hasAuthorship W4297548944A5085203241 @default.
• W4297548944 hasBestOaLocation W42975489441 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2776283816 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2777683338 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2778975662 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2779609443 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2779777945 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2910372796 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C126838900 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C141071460 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2775967933 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2776283816 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2777683338 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2778444009 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2778975662 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2779609443 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2779777945 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2780813298 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2910372796 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C2911091166 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C71924100 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C8443397 @default.
• W4297548944 hasConceptScore W4297548944C90924648 @default.
• W4297548944 hasLocation W42975489441 @default.
• W4297548944 hasLocation W42975489442 @default.
• W4297548944 hasLocation W42975489443 @default.
• W4297548944 hasLocation W42975489444 @default.
• W4297548944 hasOpenAccess W4297548944 @default.
• W4297548944 hasPrimaryLocation W42975489441 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W1546759364 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W1927612288 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2010933410 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2031250893 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2037087212 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2061891380 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2094800712 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2098706480 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W2415568867 @default.
• W4297548944 hasRelatedWork W40286446 @default.
• W4297548944 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W4297548944 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4297548944 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4297548944 workType "article" @default.