Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4300529457> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4300529457 endingPage "1178" @default.
- W4300529457 startingPage "1147" @default.
- W4300529457 abstract "This paper reviews the methodologies most frequently used by social scientists when measuring discrimination in housing and labor markets and assesses their potential usefulness for analyzing discrimination in education. We begin by briefly reviewing what economists typically mean by racial discrimination in housing and labor markets and note that the standard definition is somewhat more complicated in the case of education. We then review four methodologies—standard statistical methods (e.g., multiple regression), methods using more complete data (e.g., productivity vs. wages or applications for jobs/housing vs. acceptances), experimental/audit methods, and natural experiments based on actual policy changes. The strengths and weaknesses of the four methods when used on housing and labor markets are assessed. We then consider the extent to which each of the methods can be applied to education and the potential usefulness and limitations of trying to do so. We conclude that each of the four methods has some potential uses in analyzing discrimination in education." @default.
- W4300529457 created "2022-10-03" @default.
- W4300529457 creator A5077077640 @default.
- W4300529457 creator A5085753634 @default.
- W4300529457 date "2003-06-01" @default.
- W4300529457 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4300529457 title "Measuring Discrimination in Education: Are Methodologies from Labor and Markets Useful?" @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1561610946 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1577001291 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1972642660 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1972815642 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1987778994 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W1994472307 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2001359802 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2001733640 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2015046142 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2017013274 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2018156380 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2020662823 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2029394297 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2031402358 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2054037695 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2055989807 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2066735350 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2071122767 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2080061756 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2085976822 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2094053154 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2095333261 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2109072432 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2110399860 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2114389382 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2127629883 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2133513458 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2135214700 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2138110879 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2144328703 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2150291618 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2150474429 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2155368426 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2156443068 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2156471102 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2158375323 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2161160464 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2161800660 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2166626454 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W2259884781 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3121323193 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3121853310 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3122588894 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3122641840 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3122889739 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3122948292 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3123135512 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W3123974754 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4213155903 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4214929072 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4230754796 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4240275752 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4251381017 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4251698794 @default.
- W4300529457 cites W4254516067 @default.
- W4300529457 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810310500607" @default.
- W4300529457 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W4300529457 type Work @default.
- W4300529457 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4300529457 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4300529457 hasAuthorship W4300529457A5077077640 @default.
- W4300529457 hasAuthorship W4300529457A5085753634 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C139838865 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C152877465 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C2779297142 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C41458344 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C107993555 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C119857082 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C121955636 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C139838865 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C144024400 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C145236788 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C152877465 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C15744967 @default.
- W4300529457 hasConceptScore W4300529457C162118730 @default.