FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4300777782> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4300777782 endingPage "106" @default.
• W4300777782 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4300777782 abstract "Pressure injuries (bedsores) are common and reduce quality of life. They are also costly and difficult to treat. This health technology assessment evaluates the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and lived experience of adding electrical stimulation to standard wound care for pressure injuries.We conducted a systematic search for studies published to December 7, 2016, limited to randomized and non-randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of electrical stimulation plus standard wound care versus standard wound care alone for patients with pressure injuries. We assessed the quality of evidence through Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). In addition, we conducted an economic literature review and a budget impact analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness and affordability of electrical stimulation for treatment of pressure ulcers in Ontario. Given uncertainties in clinical evidence and resource use, we did not conduct a primary economic evaluation. Finally, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers about their experiences with pressure injuries, currently available treatments, and (if applicable) electrical stimulation.Nine randomized controlled trials and two non-randomized controlled trials were found from the systematic search. There was no significant difference in complete pressure injury healing between adjunct electrical stimulation and standard wound care. There was a significant difference in wound surface area reduction favouring electrical stimulation compared with standard wound care.The only study on cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation was partially applicable to the patient population of interest. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation cannot be determined. We estimate that the cost of publicly funding electrical stimulation for pressure injuries would be $0.77 to $3.85 million yearly for the next 5 years.Patients and caregivers reported that pressure injuries were burdensome and reduced their quality of life. Patients and caregivers also noted that electrical stimulation seemed to reduce the time it took the wounds to heal.While electrical stimulation is safe to use (GRADE quality of evidence: high) there is uncertainty about whether it improves wound healing (GRADE quality of evidence: low). In Ontario, publicly funding electrical stimulation for pressure injuries could result in extra costs of $0.77 to $3.85 million yearly for the next 5 years." @default.
• W4300777782 created "2022-10-04" @default.
• W4300777782 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W4300777782 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4300777782 title "Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment." @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1562324473 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1747728146 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W181027369 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1884042052 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1964206180 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1969345398 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1974888790 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W1995825010 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2011763887 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2016344546 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2027464948 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2040796623 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2047677041 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2053916534 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2066222653 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2073314653 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2094359892 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2097899783 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2100082745 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2102020282 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2111319473 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2116654531 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2123018963 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2123728370 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2136403658 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2165326619 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2186747851 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2263352011 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2299177375 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2416247526 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W246286872 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2519956131 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2566457873 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W2909566557 @default.
• W4300777782 cites W53552306 @default.
• W4300777782 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29201261" @default.
• W4300777782 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W4300777782 type Work @default.
• W4300777782 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4300777782 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C112930515 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C126322002 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C127413603 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C141071460 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C147176958 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C160735492 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C162324750 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C168563851 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C177713679 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C1862650 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C24998067 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C2777286243 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C2908647359 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C3019080777 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C50522688 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C535046627 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C71924100 @default.
• W4300777782 hasConceptScore W4300777782C99454951 @default.
• W4300777782 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W4300777782 hasLocation W43007777821 @default.
• W4300777782 hasOpenAccess W4300777782 @default.
• W4300777782 hasPrimaryLocation W43007777821 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W1982885725 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2016681914 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2033040494 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2043601330 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2086223707 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2128447107 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2132462576 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2401871460 @default.
• W4300777782 hasRelatedWork W2580809824 @default.

• next