FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4300979689> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4300979689 endingPage "3748" @default.
• W4300979689 startingPage "3739" @default.
• W4300979689 abstract "Abstract Adjacent segment stenosis can occur after lumbar fusion surgery, leading to significant discomfort and pain. If further surgeries are required, the choice of the operative technique is an individual decision. In patients without over instability, it is still uncertain whether patients with adjacent spinal stenosis should be treated like primary lumbar spinal stenosis via decompressive surgery alone or with decompression and fusion. This is a retrospective analysis with prospective collected data. We included patients with adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion. Patients with spinal deformity and/or obvious instability and/or significant neuroforaminal stenosis were excluded. All patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique that has been used: (a) treated via microsurgical decompression (MDG), (b) decompression and fusion of the adjacent segment (FG). Treatment decision was at discretion of the surgeon. Primary outcome was the need for further lumbar surgery after 1 year. In addition, patient reported outcome was measured via numerical rating scale (NRS), SF-36, Oswestry disability Index (ODI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and General Depression Scale before and after 1 year after surgery. In a further follow-up, need for additional lumbar surgery was redetermined. Total study population was 37 patients with a median age of 72 years. A total of 86.1% of patients suffered from a proximal adjacent segment stenosis and most common level was L3/4 (51.4%). A total of 61.1% of included patients developed adjacent segment stenosis after fusion of one single lumbar segment. Eighteen patients were included in MDG and 19 patients in FG. Both groups benefited from surgical interventions and there was no significant difference concerning pain, pain associated disability, sleeping, life quality, and mood after 1 year or the need of follow-up surgeries 1 year after primary fusion (5 in MDG vs. 5 in FG, p = 0.92) and at the second follow-up with a median time after surgery of 30 months (6 in MDG vs. 7 in FG, p = 0.823). Duration of surgery and hospital stay was significant shorter in MDG. There was no difference concerning operative complications rate. Both groups improved significantly in pain associated disability index, pain in motion, and concerning the sleeping quality. The present study indicates that decompression may not be inferior to decompression and fusion in patients suffering from degenerative adjacent segment stenosis without obvious signs of instability, deformation, and neuroforaminal stenosis after lumbar fusion in short-term follow-up. Due to significant shorter time of surgery, a pure microsurgical decompression may be a sufficient alternative to a decompression and fusion, particular regarding old age of this patient cohort." @default.
• W4300979689 created "2022-10-04" @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5006454522 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5008353912 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5009615702 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5011507318 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5022652749 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5033032391 @default.
• W4300979689 creator A5036646205 @default.
• W4300979689 date "2022-10-04" @default.
• W4300979689 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4300979689 title "Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusions" @default.
• W4300979689 cites W1977658515 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W1985934723 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W1990737257 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W1995633792 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2003975081 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2062107755 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2074983465 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2075821933 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2077876708 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2081749109 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2118516436 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2151487996 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2157407858 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2163014846 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2339565424 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2673483870 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2800741483 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W2801893920 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W3087356388 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W3108496975 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W3190550140 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W4214729299 @default.
• W4300979689 cites W4245742583 @default.
• W4300979689 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01875-4" @default.
• W4300979689 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36194374" @default.
• W4300979689 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4300979689 type Work @default.
• W4300979689 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4300979689 countsByYear W43009796892023 @default.
• W4300979689 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5006454522 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5008353912 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5009615702 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5011507318 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5022652749 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5033032391 @default.
• W4300979689 hasAuthorship W4300979689A5036646205 @default.
• W4300979689 hasBestOaLocation W43009796891 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2779631646 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2780175798 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C126838900 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C141071460 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C142724271 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C204787440 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2775998654 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2776008035 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2779480328 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2779631646 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2780007028 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2780175798 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2780375110 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C2780907711 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C44575665 @default.
• W4300979689 hasConceptScore W4300979689C71924100 @default.
• W4300979689 hasFunder F4320321526 @default.
• W4300979689 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4300979689 hasLocation W43009796891 @default.
• W4300979689 hasLocation W43009796892 @default.
• W4300979689 hasLocation W43009796893 @default.
• W4300979689 hasOpenAccess W4300979689 @default.
• W4300979689 hasPrimaryLocation W43009796891 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W1964624127 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W2339565424 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W2363197838 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W2495180400 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W2598429501 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W2947589068 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W3124229562 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W3202885189 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W4300979689 @default.
• W4300979689 hasRelatedWork W4313609091 @default.
• W4300979689 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W4300979689 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4300979689 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next