FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4301461042> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4301461042 endingPage "1629" @default.
• W4301461042 startingPage "1625" @default.
• W4301461042 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyClinical Urology: Original Article1 May 1997A Multicenter Clinical Trial Investigating the Use of a Fluoroscopically Controlled Cutting Balloon Catheter for the Management of Ureteral and Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Glenn M. Preminger, Ralph V. Clayman, Stephen Y. Nakada, Richard K. Babayan, David M. Albala, Gerhard J. Fuchs, and Arthur D. Smith Glenn M. PremingerGlenn M. Preminger More articles by this author , Ralph V. ClaymanRalph V. Clayman More articles by this author , Stephen Y. NakadaStephen Y. Nakada More articles by this author , Richard K. BabayanRichard K. Babayan More articles by this author , David M. AlbalaDavid M. Albala More articles by this author , Gerhard J. FuchsGerhard J. Fuchs More articles by this author , and Arthur D. SmithArthur D. Smith More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64813-4AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of a fluoroscopically controlled cutting balloon catheter for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction and ureteral strictures. Materials and Methods: A multicenter trial was performed that included66 endopyelotomies and 49 endoureterotomies. To our knowledge this study represents the largest number of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral strictures tested with this device to date. Results: With a mean followup of 7.8 months (range 1 to 17.9) the patency rate was 77% for endopyelotomy, with 72% of the primary and 100% of the secondary ureteropelvic junction obstructions remaining patent. The endoureterotomy patients were followed for an average of 8.7 months (range 1.2 to 17.0), with a patency rate of 55%. Conclusions: A cutting balloon endoscopic incision is effective in the majority of cases, with patency rates for endopyelotomies and endoureterotomies that mirror current endourological reports using other, albeit more time intensive and more invasive, incisional techniques. References 1 : Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): technique and early results. J. Urol.1986; 135: 26. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Long-term efficacy of retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. J. Urol., part 21993; 149: 276A. abstract 249. Google Scholar 3 : Ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy. J. Urol.1990; 144: 246. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Endosurgical techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of noncalculous disease of the ureter and kidney. In: . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.1992: 2231. chapt. 62. Google Scholar 5 : Endopyelotomy: patient selection, results, and complications. Urology1994; 43: 2. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6 : Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year follow-up. J. Urol.1993; 149: 453. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. J. Urol.1992; 148: 775. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the Acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: preliminary experience. J. Endourol.1993; 7: 45. Google Scholar 9 : Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability. J. Urol.1996; 156: 1094. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Long-term follow-up of Acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral strictures. Urology1996; 47: 317. Google Scholar 11 : Endopyelotomy in the elderly. J. Urol.1993; 150: 1107. Abstract, Google Scholar 12 : Complications of endopyelotomy: analysis in series of 64 patients. J. Urol.1988; 140: 473. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors. J. Urol.1994; 151: 934. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Evaluation of optimal stent size after endourologic incision of ureteral strictures. (Preliminary Report). J. Urol., part 21994; 151: 338A. abstract 442. Google Scholar 15 : Percutaneous antegrade endoscopic pyelotomy: review of 50 consecutive cases. J. Urol.1995; 153: 701. Link, Google Scholar From the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusettes, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and Long Island Jewish Hospital, New Hyde Park, New York.© 1997 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byColaco M, Caveney M and Terlecki R (2017) Performance of Adult Pyeloplasty Relative to Endourological Management in the Era of Robotic Surgery: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient SampleUrology Practice, VOL. 5, NO. 2, (120-123), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.Gnessin E, Yossepowitch O, Holland R, Livne P and Lifshitz D (2009) Holmium Laser Endoureterotomy for Benign Ureteral Stricture: A Single Center ExperienceJournal of Urology, VOL. 182, NO. 6, (2775-2779), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.El-Nahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, El-Kenawy M and El-Kappany H (2018) Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Ureteroscopic Endopyelotomy Using Holmium:YAG Laser and Balloon CatheterJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 2, (614-618), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2006.VARKARAKIS I, BHAYANI S, ALLAF M, INAGAKI T, ONG A, KAVOUSSI L and JARRETT T (2018) MANAGEMENT OF SECONDARY URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION AFTER FAILED PRIMARY LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTYJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 1, (180-182), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004.ALBANI J, YOST A and STREEM S (2018) Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Determining Durability of Endourological InterventionJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 2, (579-582), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2004.BOVE P, ONG A, RHA K, PINTO P, JARRETT T and KAVOUSSI L (2018) Laparoscopic Management of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract AnomaliesJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 1, (77-79), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.GETTMAN M, LOTAN Y, ROERHBORN C, CADEDDU J and PEARLE M (2018) Cost-Effective Treatment for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Decision Tree AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 1, (228-232), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003.Watterson J, Sofer M, Wollin T, Nott L and Denstedt J (2018) Holmium: Yag Laser Endoureterotomy For Ureterointestinal StricturesJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 4, (1692-1695), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2002.JARRETT T, CHAN D, CHARAMBURA T, FUGITA O and KAVOUSSI L (2018) LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: THE FIRST 100 CASESJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 3, (1253-1256), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002.KNOWLES D, STAIMAN V and GUPTA M (2018) LONG-TERM RESULTS OF THE TREATMENT OF COMPLETE DISTAL URETERAL STENOSIS USING A CUTTING BALLOON CATHETER DEVICEJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 6, (2087-2090), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.SCHWARTZ B and STOLLER M (2018) COMPLICATIONS OF RETROGRADE BALLOON CAUTERY ENDOPYELOTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 5, (1594-1598), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1999.BAUER J, BISHOFF J, MOORE R, CHEN R, IVERSON A and KAVOUSSI L (2018) LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN PYELOPLASTY: ASSESSMENT OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE OUTCOMEJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 3 Part 1, (692-695), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.NAKADA S, SABAN R, ZINE M, UEHLING D and BJORLING D (2018) IN VITRO PASSIVE SENSITIZATION OF THE URETER AS A BASIS FOR THE STUDY OF NONINFECTIOUS URETERAL INFLAMMATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 5, (1924-1927), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.TAWFIEK E, LIU J and BAGLEY D (2018) URETEROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 5, (1643-1647), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.SHALHAV A, GIUSTI G, ELBAHNASY A, HOENIG D, McDOUGALL E, SMITH D, MAXWELL K and CLAYMAN R (2018) ADULT ENDOPYELOTOMY: IMPACT OF ETIOLOGY AND ANTEGRADE VERSUS RETROGRADE APPROACH ON OUTCOMEJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 3 Part 1, (685-689), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1998. Volume 157Issue 5May 1997Page: 1625-1629 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1997 by American Urological Association, Inc.Metrics Author Information Glenn M. Preminger More articles by this author Ralph V. Clayman More articles by this author Stephen Y. Nakada More articles by this author Richard K. Babayan More articles by this author David M. Albala More articles by this author Gerhard J. Fuchs More articles by this author Arthur D. Smith More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4301461042 created "2022-10-05" @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5004625882 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5030793890 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5036545543 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5046166302 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5052662109 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5066680776 @default.
• W4301461042 creator A5077067684 @default.
• W4301461042 date "1997-05-01" @default.
• W4301461042 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4301461042 title "A Multicenter Clinical Trial Investigating the Use of a Fluoroscopically Controlled Cutting Balloon Catheter for the Management of Ureteral and Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction" @default.
• W4301461042 cites W1686723526 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W1975573111 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W1976282776 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2011776516 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2030005947 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2045406634 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2252927570 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2272702982 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2298309897 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2415990836 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W2435366247 @default.
• W4301461042 cites W4243565901 @default.
• W4301461042 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64813-4" @default.
• W4301461042 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W4301461042 type Work @default.
• W4301461042 citedByCount "100" @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422012 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422013 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422014 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422015 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422016 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422017 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422018 @default.
• W4301461042 countsByYear W43014610422019 @default.
• W4301461042 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5004625882 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5030793890 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5036545543 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5046166302 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5052662109 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5066680776 @default.
• W4301461042 hasAuthorship W4301461042A5077067684 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C139059822 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2779313828 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2779863012 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2781040948 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C2993470428 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C126322002 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C126838900 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C139059822 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C141071460 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2776805002 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2778283817 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2778583881 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2779313828 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2779863012 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2781040948 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2781267111 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C2993470428 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C71924100 @default.
• W4301461042 hasConceptScore W4301461042C77411442 @default.
• W4301461042 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4301461042 hasLocation W43014610421 @default.
• W4301461042 hasOpenAccess W4301461042 @default.
• W4301461042 hasPrimaryLocation W43014610421 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W1994458908 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W2028765389 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W2037870171 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W2087341802 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W2159801491 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W2384284935 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W3200920415 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W401579253 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W4322576091 @default.
• W4301461042 hasRelatedWork W65030056 @default.
• W4301461042 hasVolume "157" @default.
• W4301461042 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4301461042 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4301461042 workType "article" @default.