FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4303419105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4303419105 abstract "Abstract Background Polygenic risk scores (PRS), which offer information about genomic risk for common diseases, have been proposed for clinical implementation. The ways in which PRS information may influence a patient’s health trajectory depend on how both the patient and their primary care provider (PCP) interpret and act on PRS information. We aimed to probe patient and PCP responses to PRS clinical reporting choices Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews of both patients ( N =25) and PCPs ( N =21) exploring responses to mock PRS clinical reports of two different designs: binary and continuous representations of PRS. Results Many patients did not understand the numbers representing risk, with high numeracy patients being the exception. However, all the patients still understood a key takeaway that they should ask their PCP about actions to lower their disease risk. PCPs described a diverse range of heuristics they would use to interpret and act on PRS information. Three separate use cases for PRS emerged: to aid in gray-area clinical decision-making, to encourage patients to do what PCPs think patients should be doing anyway (such as exercising regularly), and to identify previously unrecognized high-risk patients. PCPs indicated that receiving “below average risk” information could be both beneficial and potentially harmful, depending on the use case. For “increased risk” patients, PCPs were favorable towards integrating PRS information into their practice, though some would only act in the presence of evidence-based guidelines. PCPs describe the report as more than a way to convey information, viewing it as something to structure the whole interaction with the patient. Both patients and PCPs preferred the continuous over the binary representation of PRS (23/25 and 17/21, respectively). We offer recommendations for the developers of PRS to consider for PRS clinical report design in the light of these patient and PCP viewpoints. Conclusions PCPs saw PRS information as a natural extension of their current practice. The most pressing gap for PRS implementation is evidence for clinical utility. Careful clinical report design can help ensure that benefits are realized and harms are minimized." @default.
• W4303419105 created "2022-10-07" @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5007421753 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5009082755 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5021507441 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5025907276 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5034174255 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5035126983 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5044998046 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5047805367 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5051026735 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5064984144 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5065050960 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5065270481 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5073763243 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5075565472 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5079062422 @default.
• W4303419105 creator A5082819294 @default.
• W4303419105 date "2022-10-07" @default.
• W4303419105 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4303419105 title "Patient and provider perspectives on polygenic risk scores: implications for clinical reporting and utilization" @default.
• W4303419105 cites W1788794177 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2005091374 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2051978340 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2067220183 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2096016260 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2102661682 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2108150621 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2126800506 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2143417015 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2168536722 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2303883198 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2528514103 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2591534455 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2753454143 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2803820580 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2886752110 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2904829056 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2932671560 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2975820925 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2983742483 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W2984114374 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3001764054 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3004083863 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3035885149 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3037880333 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3139858632 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3162351393 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3184690700 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3186788701 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3194073932 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3195429937 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3202854392 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3205412600 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3208317563 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3208534178 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3208645186 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W3217131706 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4210835581 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4220855165 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4223924706 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4225137957 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4240668423 @default.
• W4303419105 cites W4292253925 @default.
• W4303419105 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01117-8" @default.
• W4303419105 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36207733" @default.
• W4303419105 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4303419105 type Work @default.
• W4303419105 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W4303419105 countsByYear W43034191052023 @default.
• W4303419105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5007421753 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5009082755 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5021507441 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5025907276 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5034174255 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5035126983 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5044998046 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5047805367 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5051026735 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5064984144 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5065050960 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5065270481 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5073763243 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5075565472 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5079062422 @default.
• W4303419105 hasAuthorship W4303419105A5082819294 @default.
• W4303419105 hasBestOaLocation W43034191051 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C127705205 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConceptScore W4303419105C111919701 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConceptScore W4303419105C127705205 @default.
• W4303419105 hasConceptScore W4303419105C17744445 @default.

• next