Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4303986378> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4303986378 endingPage "152660282211278" @default.
- W4303986378 startingPage "152660282211278" @default.
- W4303986378 abstract "Purpose: To analyze sac evolution patterns in matched patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA) treated with standard endovascular aneurysm repair (sEVAR) and endosutured aneurysm repair (ESAR). Methods: Observational retrospective study using prospectively collected data between June 2010 and December 2019. ESAR group data were extracted from the primary arm of the PERU registry with an assigned identifier (NCT04100499) at 8 centers and those from the sEVAR came from 4 centers. Suitability for inclusion required: no proximal endograft adjuncts (besides EndoAnchor use), ≤15 mm neck length and minimum of 12-months follow-up imaging. Bubble-shaped neck (noncylindrical short neck with discontinuous seal) aspect was analyzed. Both groups were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) for aortic neck length, width, angulation, and device fixation type. Main outcome assessed was sac evolution patterns (sac expansion and regression were defined as >5mm increase or decrease, of the maximum sac diameter respectively; all AAAs within this ±5 mm range in diameter change were considered stable) and secondary outcomes were type-Ia endoleaks; other endoleaks and mortality. A power analysis calculation >80% was confirmed for sac regression evaluation. Results: After exclusions, PSM resulted in 96 ESAR and 96 sEVAR patients. Mean imaging follow-up (months) was 44.4±21.3 versus 43.0±19.6 (p=0.643), respectively. The overall number of patients achieving sac regression was higher in the ESAR group ( n=57, 59.4% vs n=31, 32.3%; p<0.001) and the cumulative sac regression achieved at 5 years was 65% versus 38% (p=0.003) in favor of the ESAR group. There were no statistically significant differences in type-Ia endoleak and/or other endoleaks. Univariate analysis for sac regression patients in the sEVAR and ESAR group individually showed the bubble-shape neck as a predictor of sac regression failure. There were no statistical differences in overall and aneurysm-related mortality. Conclusion: Endosutured aneurysm repair provided improved rates of sac regression for patients with AAA and HNA when compared with sEVAR at midterm and up to 5 years, despite similar rates of type-Ia endoleaks, and the need to consider some important limitations. The presence of bubble-shaped neck was a predictor of sac regression failure for both groups equally. Clinical Impact The use of EndoAnchors aids and improves EVAR treatment in hostile neck anatomies by an increased rate of sac regression when compared to EVAR treatment alone in up to 5 year analysis. Moreover, a trend to reduced number of type Ia endoleaks is also achieved, although not significant in the present study. This data, adds to current and growing evidence on the usefulness of EndoAnchors for AAA endovascular treatment." @default.
- W4303986378 created "2022-10-10" @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5009379317 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5018585563 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5020805023 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5030487113 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5040632988 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5040783037 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5047191426 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5057768807 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5084826006 @default.
- W4303986378 creator A5086318973 @default.
- W4303986378 date "2022-10-10" @default.
- W4303986378 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W4303986378 title "The Effect of EndoAnchors on Aneurysm Sac Regression for Patients Treated With Infrarenal Endovascular Repair With Hostile Neck Anatomies: A Propensity Scored Analysis" @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2008875394 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2087919816 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2156798468 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2160648471 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2262199528 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2372070161 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2587918552 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2594659774 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2603487308 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2621206099 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2753205305 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2773904543 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2801984685 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2811146475 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2902783010 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2955849573 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2958122282 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2983511535 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W2995785976 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3008310805 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3010925350 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3011927227 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3024707915 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3025801724 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3037080498 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3084340266 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3087918318 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3092530434 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3125423253 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3126416453 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3127985818 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3154164305 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3171055204 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3172481462 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3173060763 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3175991151 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3184463705 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3187556202 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3203974724 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W3204231134 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W4200315205 @default.
- W4303986378 cites W4214890507 @default.
- W4303986378 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221127839" @default.
- W4303986378 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36214450" @default.
- W4303986378 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4303986378 type Work @default.
- W4303986378 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W4303986378 countsByYear W43039863782023 @default.
- W4303986378 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5009379317 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5018585563 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5020805023 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5030487113 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5040632988 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5040783037 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5047191426 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5057768807 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5084826006 @default.
- W4303986378 hasAuthorship W4303986378A5086318973 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C2776543907 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C141071460 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C167135981 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C17923572 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C2776098176 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C2776543907 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C2779993416 @default.
- W4303986378 hasConceptScore W4303986378C71924100 @default.
- W4303986378 hasLocation W43039863781 @default.
- W4303986378 hasLocation W43039863782 @default.
- W4303986378 hasOpenAccess W4303986378 @default.
- W4303986378 hasPrimaryLocation W43039863781 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2002398460 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2017136727 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2034086321 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2095151276 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2111126523 @default.
- W4303986378 hasRelatedWork W2394922615 @default.