FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4304172159> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4304172159 endingPage "23" @default.
• W4304172159 startingPage "13" @default.
• W4304172159 abstract "남성 요실금의 유병률은 나이에 따라 증가하는 양상을 보이며, 최근 보고에 의하면 40세 이상 남성 의 17.3% 가 요실금 증상을 가지고 있다. 노인 와상 환자 및 선천적 혹은 사고로 인한 중증 요실금 환자들의 경우, 요도카테타, 콘돔 카테타, 착용형 소변 수집기, 요실금용 팬티 등을 요실금 관리를 위하여 사용한다. 본 연구는 최근남성 활동형 요실금 환자를 위해서 개발된 착용형 소변 수집기와 남성 요실금용 팬티의 사용적합성을 비교 평가하여 남성 요실금 환자들에게 배뇨용품 선택의 정보를 제공하기 위한 목적으로 수행하였다. 소변 수집기는 실리콘으로 제작되어 팬티에 고정되며 수집된 소변은 소변 튜브를 통하여 소변백에 저장되는 형태이다. 남성 요실금 팬티는 일회용 팬티에 소변 흡수 패드가 박음질된 형태이다. 요실금 제품을 바지 속에 착용하고 찍은 사진을 비교하였을 때 두 제품 간에는 미관상의 큰 차이는 없었다. 배뇨용품을 착용한 상태에서 소변이 배출되기 전의 불편감의 정도는 서있을 때와 걷는 상태에서는 소변 수집기의 경우가 더 크며, 앉은 상태에서는 요실금용 팬티의 불편감이 더 컷다. 소변 배출 후의 불편감은 앉은 상태에서는 소변 수집기가 더 컷으며, 걷는 상태에서는 소변 수집기의 불편감이 더 컸다. 소변 수집기의 경우, 소변이 배출되는 과정에서 약간의 누출이발생하나 외부로 표시날 정도는 아니었다. 경제성 평가에서, 소변 수집기는 요실금 패드보다 훨씬 비용이 저렴한것으로 계산되었다. 본 연구는 5명의 대학생이 참여한 시범 연구이었으며, 착용형 소변 수집기와 일회용 요실금 팬티 사용의 장단점을 잘 보여주고 있어 남성 요실금 환자들의 배뇨용품 선택에 유용한 정보를 제공해 준다The prevalence of male incontinence increases with age, and it is reported that 17.3 % of men over 40 have urinary incontinence symptoms. In the case of elderly bed-ridden patients and the patients with severe congenital or accidental incontinence, urinary catheters, condom catheters, wearable urine collectors, and incontinence underwears are used for incontinence management. The purpose of this study was to provide information on the selection of incontinence products to male patients by comparing and evaluating the usability of a wearable urine collector and male incontinence underwear developed for male active incontinence patients. The urine collector is made of silicone and is attached to a specially designed underwear, and the collected urine is stored in a urine bag through a urine tube. Men's incontinence underwear is a disposable one with a urine absorbent pad sewn inside the underwear. When the degree of protrusion to the outside was compared through the photos taken, there was no significant difference in aesthetics between the two products. The degree of discomfort before the urine discharge was greater with the urine collector in standing and walking states, and it was greater with the incontinence underwear in the sitting state. The degree of discomfort after urination was greater with the urine collector in the walking state, and it was greater with the incontinence underwear in the sitting state. In the case of the urine collector, some leakage occurred during the discharge of urine, but it was not visible from the outside. In economic evaluation, the use of urine collector was calculated to be significantly less costlythan the incontinence underwear. This study was a pilot study in which 5 college students participated, and showed the merits and demerits of using the wearable urine collector or the disposable incontinence underwear, and thus providing significant information in selecting proper incontinent product for male incontinence patients." @default.
• W4304172159 created "2022-10-11" @default.
• W4304172159 creator A5033681555 @default.
• W4304172159 creator A5048200670 @default.
• W4304172159 creator A5056123166 @default.
• W4304172159 creator A5089092419 @default.
• W4304172159 date "2022-09-30" @default.
• W4304172159 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4304172159 title "Comparative Evaluation of Usability Between Men’s Wearable Urine Collector and Incontinence Underwear" @default.
• W4304172159 doi "https://doi.org/10.34139/jscs.2022.12.3.13" @default.
• W4304172159 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4304172159 type Work @default.
• W4304172159 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4304172159 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4304172159 hasAuthorship W4304172159A5033681555 @default.
• W4304172159 hasAuthorship W4304172159A5048200670 @default.
• W4304172159 hasAuthorship W4304172159A5056123166 @default.
• W4304172159 hasAuthorship W4304172159A5089092419 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C175768497 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C2776370487 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C2780026642 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C126322002 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C126894567 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C142724271 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C175768497 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C2776370487 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C2778531004 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C2780026642 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C71924100 @default.
• W4304172159 hasConceptScore W4304172159C77411442 @default.
• W4304172159 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4304172159 hasLocation W43041721591 @default.
• W4304172159 hasOpenAccess W4304172159 @default.
• W4304172159 hasPrimaryLocation W43041721591 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2025722779 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2057903833 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2120561004 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2141225133 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2387958031 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2394242219 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2415946463 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2438277808 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W2597894820 @default.
• W4304172159 hasRelatedWork W3175161634 @default.
• W4304172159 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W4304172159 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4304172159 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4304172159 workType "article" @default.