FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4304957926> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4304957926 endingPage "470" @default.
• W4304957926 startingPage "461" @default.
• W4304957926 abstract "Abstract Background The aim of the study was to compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system (SRS) in consecutive patients, and to compare the margin status of resected lesions versus pathological assessment. Patients and methods Resected tissue specimens from consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative breast specimen assessment following wide local excision or oncoplastic breast conservative surgery were examined by FFDM, tomosynthesis and SRS. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the visibility of lesions, size, margins, spiculations, calcifications and diagnostic certainty, and chose the best performing method in a blinded manner. Results We evaluated 216 specimens from 204 patients. All target malignant lesions were removed with no tumouron-ink. One papilloma had positive microscopic margins and one patient underwent reoperation owing to extensive in situ components. There were no significant differences in measured lesion size among the three methods. However, tomosynthesis was the most accurate modality when compared with the final pathological report. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis had significantly better lesion visibility than SRS and FFDM, which translated into a significantly greater diagnostic certainty. Tomosynthesis was superior to the other two methods in identifying spiculations and calcifications. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis was the best performing method in 76.9% of cases. The interobserver reproducibilities of lesion visibility and diagnostic certainty were high for all three methods. Conclusions Tomosynthesis was superior to SRS and FFDM for detecting and evaluating the target lesions, spiculations and calcifications, and was therefore more reliable for assessing complete excision of breast lesions." @default.
• W4304957926 created "2022-10-14" @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5006056011 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5024895874 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5024911719 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5026546218 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5030240805 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5072159520 @default.
• W4304957926 creator A5075217394 @default.
• W4304957926 date "2022-10-13" @default.
• W4304957926 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4304957926 title "Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions" @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2016051726 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2027470031 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2047155628 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2067420088 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2085328335 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2096591597 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2130746306 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2160374037 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2272812002 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2326053514 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2326417880 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2467184889 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2505592464 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2604582094 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2621169893 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2748862739 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2804937217 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2889144599 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2901763515 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2922466927 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2961295021 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2963216264 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W2972583753 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W3008159503 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W3046685829 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W3133440421 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W3188400979 @default.
• W4304957926 cites W979105628 @default.
• W4304957926 doi "https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0036" @default.
• W4304957926 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36226804" @default.
• W4304957926 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4304957926 type Work @default.
• W4304957926 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4304957926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5006056011 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5024895874 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5024911719 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5026546218 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5030240805 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5072159520 @default.
• W4304957926 hasAuthorship W4304957926A5075217394 @default.
• W4304957926 hasBestOaLocation W43049579261 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C147454874 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C207886595 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C2781281974 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C2781305912 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C2909182381 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C121608353 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C126322002 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C126838900 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C142724271 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C147454874 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C207886595 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C2780472235 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C2781281974 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C2781305912 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C2909182381 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C2989005 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C36454342 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C530470458 @default.
• W4304957926 hasConceptScore W4304957926C71924100 @default.
• W4304957926 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4304957926 hasLocation W43049579261 @default.
• W4304957926 hasLocation W43049579262 @default.
• W4304957926 hasLocation W43049579263 @default.
• W4304957926 hasOpenAccess W4304957926 @default.
• W4304957926 hasPrimaryLocation W43049579261 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W1808333143 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W1966345895 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2036173279 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2130017212 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2149291062 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2555191493 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2909702310 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W2944306382 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W3194844807 @default.
• W4304957926 hasRelatedWork W4294145423 @default.

• next