FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4306180645> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4306180645 endingPage "e0275633" @default.
• W4306180645 startingPage "e0275633" @default.
• W4306180645 abstract "Introduction Medication errors are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The p harmacist-led I T-based i n tervention to reduce c linically important medication er rors (PINCER) intervention was shown to reduce medication errors when tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial and when implemented across one region of England. Now that it has been rolled out nationally, and to enhance findings from evaluations with staff and stakeholders, this paper is the first to report patients’ perceived acceptability on the use of PINCER in primary care and proposes suggestions on how delivery of PINCER related care could be delivered in a way that is acceptable and not unnecessarily burdensome. Methods A total of 46 participants living with long-term health conditions who had experience of medication reviews and/or monitoring were recruited through patient participant groups and social media. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted face-to-face or via telephone. A thematic analysis was conducted and findings mapped to the constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Results Two themes were identified and interpreted within the most relevant TFA construct: Perceptions on the purpose and components of PINCER (Affective Attitude and Intervention Coherence) and Perceived patient implications (Burden and Self-efficacy). Overall perceptions on PINCER were positive with participants showing good understanding of the components. Access to medication reviews, which PINCER related care can involve, was reported to be limited and a lack of consistency in practitioners delivering reviews was considered challenging, as was lack of communication between primary care and other health-care providers. Patients thought it would be helpful if medication reviews and prescription renewal times were synchronised. Remote medication review consultations were more convenient for some but viewed as a barrier to communication by others. It was acknowledged that some patients may be more resistant to change and more willing to accept changes initiated by general practitioners. Conclusions Participants found the concept of PINCER acceptable; however, acceptability could be improved if awareness on the role of primary care pharmacists is raised and patient-pharmacist relationships enhanced. Being transparent with communication and delivering streamlined and consistent but flexible PINCER related care is recommended." @default.
• W4306180645 created "2022-10-14" @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5004465480 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5008630584 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5020745438 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5026754336 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5034133535 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5050477113 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5056832225 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5060224228 @default.
• W4306180645 creator A5066306728 @default.
• W4306180645 date "2022-10-14" @default.
• W4306180645 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4306180645 title "Understanding factors that could influence patient acceptability of the use of the PINCER intervention in primary care: A qualitative exploration using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability" @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1540405158 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1544133109 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W192935245 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1969029222 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1979757243 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W1993070685 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2020101999 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2037561492 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2039906750 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2044616634 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2071472165 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2103120311 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2103474291 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2109614842 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2115516678 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2123936777 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2129234956 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2136707730 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2149530069 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2149863648 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2152480761 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2161868218 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2192816303 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2582406074 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2753417505 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2758053285 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2800633385 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2804182556 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2807820382 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2894796701 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2896855992 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2897335012 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2948620865 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W2985402971 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3016715298 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3035574358 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3041199590 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3119657379 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3130122346 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3130295924 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3131986120 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3139553455 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3154351309 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3158824059 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3159832206 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3163167121 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3165160052 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3180622737 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W3212028932 @default.
• W4306180645 cites W4235592050 @default.
• W4306180645 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275633" @default.
• W4306180645 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36240174" @default.
• W4306180645 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4306180645 type Work @default.
• W4306180645 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4306180645 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5004465480 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5008630584 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5020745438 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5026754336 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5034133535 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5050477113 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5056832225 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5060224228 @default.
• W4306180645 hasAuthorship W4306180645A5066306728 @default.
• W4306180645 hasBestOaLocation W43061806451 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConceptScore W4306180645C144024400 @default.
• W4306180645 hasConceptScore W4306180645C144133560 @default.

• next