FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4306294815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4306294815 endingPage "26" @default.
• W4306294815 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4306294815 abstract "Backgroundand Objective. Poststroke dysphagia is one of the most common stroke complications with high morbidity and long course, while acupuncture treatment is easily accepted by patients due to its reliability, feasibility, simple operation, low price, and quick effect. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of manual acupuncture in poststroke dysphagia patients. Methods. Databases including Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), WanFang (WanFang Database), and VIP (Chongqing VIP) were searched from inception until Aug 19, 2022. Data were analyzed using Revman 5.3, Stata 14.0, and TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta software. Evidence quality evaluation was performed by using GRADE profiler 3.6. Results. A total of 33 randomized control trials (RCTs) enrolled 2680 patients. Meta-analysis results revealed that compared to rehabilitation, acupuncture decreased water swallow test (WST) and standard swallowing assessment (SSA) scores. Meanwhile, in contrast to rehabilitation alone, integration of acupuncture with rehabilitation effectively decreased WST and SSA scores; improved swallowing scores of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), swallowing scores of Fujishima Ichiro, Barthel index (BI), and swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL); reduced the aspiration rates as well as aspiration pneumonia; and shortened the duration of empty swallowing and the duration of 5 mL water swallowing. Pooled analysis did not reveal any significant differences in dysphagia outcome severity scores (DOSS) ( <math xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M1> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.15</mn> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> p) between the acupuncture group combined with rehabilitation group and the rehabilitation group alone. After the risk-of-bias assessment, these studies were not of low quality, except in terms of allocation concealment and blindness. Evidence quality evaluation showed that allocation concealment and blindness led to a downgrade and primary outcomes’ evaluation of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation were ranked as moderate-quality evidence while acupuncture alone was ranked as low-quality. Conclusion. This meta-analysis provided positive pieces of evidences that acupuncture and acupuncture combined with rehabilitation were better than using rehabilitation alone in the treatment of poststroke dysphagia." @default.
• W4306294815 created "2022-10-15" @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5007989310 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5016571350 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5019685128 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5022499603 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5025450806 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5031143071 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5065551912 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5076543480 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5078999753 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5083017634 @default.
• W4306294815 creator A5085450500 @default.
• W4306294815 date "2022-10-15" @default.
• W4306294815 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4306294815 title "Manual Acupuncture or Combination of Rehabilitation Therapy to Treat Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" @default.
• W4306294815 cites W1756007928 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W1993559227 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2024227479 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2142917088 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2156075192 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2262898288 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2403952763 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2584371212 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2751764207 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2789384369 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2931960162 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2980449186 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2985753655 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W2997894427 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3010130459 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3034188762 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3042008131 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3059157058 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3092181676 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3094141478 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3129774525 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3162767818 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3177377293 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3194839745 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3198977157 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3210585982 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W3213704860 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W4200272749 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W4221073629 @default.
• W4306294815 cites W4280613185 @default.
• W4306294815 doi "https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8803507" @default.
• W4306294815 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36285156" @default.
• W4306294815 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4306294815 type Work @default.
• W4306294815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4306294815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5007989310 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5016571350 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5019685128 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5022499603 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5025450806 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5031143071 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5065551912 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5076543480 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5078999753 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5083017634 @default.
• W4306294815 hasAuthorship W4306294815A5085450500 @default.
• W4306294815 hasBestOaLocation W43062948151 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C112497637 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C56837625 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C112497637 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C126322002 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C127413603 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C141071460 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C142724271 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C159110408 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C168563851 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C17744445 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C1862650 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C199539241 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C204787440 @default.
• W4306294815 hasConceptScore W4306294815C2776478404 @default.

• next