FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4306317998> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4306317998 abstract "The Covid-19 pandemic, which started in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, has continued to wreak havoc and has changed humanity forever. The Higher Education sector, like many others, has not been spared. In an effort to save the academic year and ensure that some teaching and learning could take place in a safe and secure environment, many tertiary institutions in South Africa and other parts of the world transitioned to online education. There is no doubt that online learning promotes rich learning and understanding, and it is an effective modality for teaching both concepts and skills in most disciplines. Online education has enabled many tertiary institutions to become innovative in the way students learn and academics teach, while also overcoming the constraints of space, time and distance. However, the shift to remote learning has also unmasked historical, geospatial and economic inequalities that permeate the world in which students live. Challenges include the digital divide, lack of technical support, poor learning environments, conditions at home, and lack of assets (among others), resulting in many student organisations in Africa and South Africa rejecting online teaching, with some viewing it as “an unaffordable, impractical and an elitist solution” to COVID-19. With the realisation that COVID-19 is here to stay for a while, and many students complaining about the difficulties posed by online learning from home, it seems inevitable that many universities in South Africa have already or may in future consider expediting the return of students to campus. However, to open fully, universities (like other sectors) may deem it necessary, as part of their planning process, to make it mandatory for all staff and students to be vaccinated. The question that arises then is whether mandatory vaccination in a tertiary setting will pass constitutional muster in a court of law. Students, if required to vaccinate or produce a vaccination card upon entry to campus, may argue that their legal rights, such as their right to bodily integrity, religious freedom and possibly their choice to choose or refuse their medical treatment, may be infringed. South Africa has not yet had to deal with such challenges. However, the US case of Klaassen v Trustees of Indiana University (No 1:21-CV-238 DRL ND IND) (Klaassen) 1–101, was one of the first cases from a global perspective to deal with such challenges and can provide valuable assistance for South Africa going forward. This case note critically examines the case of Klaassen, which is a landmark case dealing with the issue of mandatory vaccinations for students within a university setting. It is hoped that the case will provide guidance to universities in drafting policy documents surrounding mandatory vaccination, as well as in dealing with possible legal challenges in future." @default.
• W4306317998 created "2022-10-16" @default.
• W4306317998 creator A5059887662 @default.
• W4306317998 date "2022-10-14" @default.
• W4306317998 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4306317998 title "THE LEGALITIES OF MANDATORY COVID-19 VACCINATION AT UNIVERSITIES: LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM Klaassen v Trustees of Indiana University (No. 1:21-CV-238 DRL, N.D. Ind.)" @default.
• W4306317998 doi "https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v43i3.14979" @default.
• W4306317998 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4306317998 type Work @default.
• W4306317998 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4306317998 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4306317998 hasAuthorship W4306317998A5059887662 @default.
• W4306317998 hasBestOaLocation W43063179981 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C134448949 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C503872463 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C120912362 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C134448949 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C142724271 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C162324750 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C17744445 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C187736073 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C199539241 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C2779134260 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C3008058167 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C39549134 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C503872463 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C50522688 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C524204448 @default.
• W4306317998 hasConceptScore W4306317998C71924100 @default.
• W4306317998 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4306317998 hasLocation W43063179981 @default.
• W4306317998 hasOpenAccess W4306317998 @default.
• W4306317998 hasPrimaryLocation W43063179981 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2032393654 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2047917455 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2047977964 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2092739183 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2352465011 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2356752352 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W3202806187 @default.
• W4306317998 hasRelatedWork W4310743512 @default.
• W4306317998 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W4306317998 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4306317998 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4306317998 workType "article" @default.