FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4307103694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4307103694 endingPage "605" @default.
• W4307103694 startingPage "579" @default.
• W4307103694 abstract "Do Your Own Research:Conspiracy Theories and the Internet Clare Birchall (bio) and Peter Knight (bio) what difference has the internet made to conspiracy theories? In the wake of recent episodes in the United States—from birtherism to the big lie, from QAnon to the COVID-19 infodemic, and from the great replacement to the great reset—the default assumption is that the internet has created an unprecedented spread of conspiracy theories. It seems commonsense that the internet in general and social media in particular have increased the volume and virality of conspiracy theories, leading to fears that polarized conspiracism threatens to undermine trust in impartial media, objective science, and even democracy itself. But is that actually the case? If some commentators have raised the alarm that the internet has changed everything in the realm of conspiracism, others have adopted the contrarian position that the internet has changed nothing. Neither claim is ultimately convincing. What is clear is the necessity of asking different kinds of research questions to understand how the internet has shaped the form and function, the production and consumption, and the causes and consequences of conspiracy narratives.1 INFORMATION WANTS TO BE FREE In an influential article from 2007 (admittedly before the full flourishing of Web 2.0 and social media), the philosopher Steve Clarke made [End Page 579] the surprisingly optimistic prediction that, although the internet might temporarily lead to an increase in the volume of conspiracy talk, in the long run it would have the opposite effect. His argument was based in part on the observation that there are calls to establish conventions regarding the reliability of information on the internet, leading him to conclude that there seems to be in principle no reason why such conventions could not be established and why these could not achieve general acceptance (Clarke 2007, 170). Clarke's hope that conspiracist misinformation would fade away in the online marketplace of ideas is bolstered by his conviction that there is a high level of critical discussion on the internet, which will entail conspiracy theories becoming (in terms adapted from Imre Lakatos) a degenerating research programme (170). The hope of Clarke and other early pundits was that the internet would enable robust criticism of conspiracy theories, with real-time fact-checking enabled by instant access to all the world's information. However, the cyberlibertarian rallying cry from the early years of the internet that information wants to be free cuts both ways. On one hand, it held out the promise that those peddling conspiracy theories would no longer be able to get away with making plausible-sounding claims, because everyone now has an infinite encyclopedia at their fingertips. On the other hand, the hope of many countercultural hackers and conspiracy theorists was that all the hidden information of states and corporations could now be leaked, exposing conspiracies and crimes for all to see. Neither of these optimistic scenarios has panned out. Shit-posting, trolling, and the monetization of controversy have undermined Clarke's fantasy of a Habermasian digital public sphere. Likewise, the sheer volume of information online means that important revelations can be lost in the infoglut (Andrejevic 2013). A GOLDEN AGE OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES With the perfect storm of the pandemic and the election in the United States in 2020, there were many headlines about a golden age of conspiracy theories (e.g., Stanton 2020). Few would challenge [End Page 580] the idea that the internet has led to a significant rise in the volume of conspiracy theories and the velocity with which they circulate in the online sphere. It is thus not surprising that three-quarters of Americans believe that social media (and the internet more generally) are to blame for the spread of conspiracy theories (Enders et al. 2021). Yet measuring this qualitative shift in quantity (de Zeeuw and Gekker n.d.) is easier said than done. First, it is important to recognize that there are several potentially distinct elements within the overarching claim: an increase in the production, the distribution, and/or the consumption of conspiracy theories. In addition, platforms do not always make it easy for researchers to measure certain activity. Nevertheless, in recent years..." @default.
• W4307103694 created "2022-10-27" @default.
• W4307103694 creator A5032974335 @default.
• W4307103694 creator A5066603963 @default.
• W4307103694 date "2022-09-01" @default.
• W4307103694 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4307103694 title "Do Your Own Research: Conspiracy Theories and the Internet" @default.
• W4307103694 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2022.0049" @default.
• W4307103694 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4307103694 type Work @default.
• W4307103694 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W4307103694 countsByYear W43071036942023 @default.
• W4307103694 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4307103694 hasAuthorship W4307103694A5032974335 @default.
• W4307103694 hasAuthorship W4307103694A5066603963 @default.
• W4307103694 hasBestOaLocation W43071036942 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C119513131 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C134531850 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C2778757428 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C2779652781 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C10138342 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C108827166 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C110875604 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C111472728 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C119513131 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C134531850 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C136764020 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C136815107 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C138885662 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C144024400 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C144133560 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C17744445 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C185592680 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C199539241 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C2778061430 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C2778757428 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C2779652781 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C29595303 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C41008148 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C518677369 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C55493867 @default.
• W4307103694 hasConceptScore W4307103694C98184364 @default.
• W4307103694 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4307103694 hasLocation W43071036941 @default.
• W4307103694 hasLocation W43071036942 @default.
• W4307103694 hasLocation W43071036943 @default.
• W4307103694 hasOpenAccess W4307103694 @default.
• W4307103694 hasPrimaryLocation W43071036941 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W19068343 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2116399990 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2216420239 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2359053655 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2382949348 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2387777532 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W2501574504 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W3122394886 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W3125756276 @default.
• W4307103694 hasRelatedWork W3123527334 @default.
• W4307103694 hasVolume "89" @default.
• W4307103694 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4307103694 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4307103694 workType "article" @default.