FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4307703044> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4307703044 abstract "In recent years, research funding agencies, universities, and governments have become increasingly concerned with promoting the reuse of research datasets. Enabling researchers to evaluate the trustworthiness and fitness-for-use of research datasets produced by others is critical for facilitating the reuse of these datasets. Understanding how researchers make these evaluations is crucial for developing digital infrastructure and tools, such as data repositories and metadata schema, in a way that better supports researchers in making these evaluations. Physical samples such as rocks are critical for generating datasets in many scientific domains. Often, samples are collected on field expeditions conducted by large infrastructural projects. These projects comprise many human and non-human components that affect the quality and integrity of samples. However, little is known about whether and how prospective dataset users evaluate the samples' trustworthiness and sample collection processes underlying these datasets. Researchers‘strategies for evaluating sample trustworthiness are explored through a longitudinal qualitative case study (ethnographic observation, interviews ( n = 66), and document analysis) of subseafloor biosphere research, an earth sciences domain. Domain researchers use rock samples collected on research cruises conducted by the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Subseafloor biosphere researchers are primarily concerned about samples being compromised by microbiological contamination. Researchers vary regarding the components of IODP infrastructure they consider when evaluating sample trustworthiness. These components include methods to process samples, people handling samples, IODP policies and procedures, and IODP organizational politics. Researchers‘strategies vary according to their disciplinary background, with microbiologists employing more fine-grained judgments about methods; whether researchers have participated in IODP expeditions, with those who have employing more fine-grained judgments about people involved; and whether researchers have ever been involved in organizing cruises or serving on IODP committees, with those who have employing more fine-grained judgments about many aspects of cruises. Researchers who make less complex decisions may be prone to erroneously trusting contaminated samples; researchers who make more complex decisions may be prone to erroneously discarding uncontaminated samples. The paper concludes by considering implications for the design of digital infrastructures to support researchers in evaluating sample trustworthiness." @default.
• W4307703044 created "2022-11-05" @default.
• W4307703044 creator A5085246934 @default.
• W4307703044 date "2022-10-28" @default.
• W4307703044 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4307703044 title "The core of the matter: How do scientists judge trustworthiness of physical samples?" @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1820635546 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1964450454 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1967483856 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1972406627 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1975976911 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1990319251 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1991083901 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W1997466122 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2007027431 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2007379715 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2014831132 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2024269180 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2024339487 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2047712922 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2047908882 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2051392755 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2056422940 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2061158453 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2062825040 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2067742437 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2087272856 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2087859867 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2091740860 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2117777000 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2119031905 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2123476269 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2130566090 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2134865903 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2155354890 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2161437414 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2283063894 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2308634414 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2412755053 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2417571158 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2482339725 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2527937327 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2552962718 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2588103623 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2604570630 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2751347658 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2753790716 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2781669397 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2786459899 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2806094966 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2808686972 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2947838964 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2952686168 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2953557668 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2954413563 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W2978328191 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W3123005344 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W4207081475 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W4239286561 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W4242397844 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W4252368274 @default.
• W4307703044 cites W784896050 @default.
• W4307703044 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.1034595" @default.
• W4307703044 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36386276" @default.
• W4307703044 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4307703044 type Work @default.
• W4307703044 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4307703044 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4307703044 hasAuthorship W4307703044A5085246934 @default.
• W4307703044 hasBestOaLocation W43077030441 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C153701036 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C206588197 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConcept C93518851 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C111472728 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C136764020 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C138885662 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C153701036 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C185592680 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C18903297 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C198531522 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C206588197 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C2522767166 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C2779530757 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C38652104 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C41008148 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C43617362 @default.
• W4307703044 hasConceptScore W4307703044C56739046 @default.

• next