Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4308182451> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4308182451 abstract "Education and advice is provided for tinnitus management in all UK audiology clinics. Sound therapy, including provision of hearing aids may be offered, but this is often dependent on a clinician's decision rather than UK policy. This inconsistent management reflects a lack of evidence around the effectiveness of hearing aids for tinnitus. This open-label, two-arm multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial gathered data around recruitment, acceptability and outcome assessments to determine the feasibility of conducting a large randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of hearing aids for tinnitus management.Adults referred to audiology for tinnitus, with an aidable hearing loss were recruited at five UK audiology clinics. They were randomised 1:1 to either education and advice (treatment as usual (TAU), n = 41) or TAU plus hearing aids (n = 42). Outcomes were collected by questionnaires 12 weeks after randomisation. After participation, interviews were conducted with a subset of both participants and clinicians from each trial centre.Eighty three participants from five sites were randomised. Non-aidable hearing loss was the main reason for ineligibility to participate in the trial reported by the sites. Seventy three percent of participants returned the 12-week questionnaires, with return rates by site ranging from 61 to 100%. Fifteen out of 33 participants (45%) reported using hearing aids for the clinician-recommended time, or longer, during the day. The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) was the outcome measure most responsive to change. The majority of participants also agreed it was relevant to their tinnitus and hearing loss. Qualitative data demonstrated that the trial was acceptable to participants. Feedback from clinicians revealed a potential lack of equipoise. It also highlighted the differences in referral and treatment pathways between departments and differences in audiometric criteria for fitting hearing aids. Health economic measures were well completed for those returned. No change in health-related quality of life was observed. Costs were higher in the intervention arm, but self-reports of healthcare service use indicated participant confusion in treatment pathways.This feasibility trial is the first step towards obtaining high quality evidence to determine potential clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of hearing aids for tinnitus versus usual care. A definitive trial was deemed to be feasible, with some modifications based on feasibility findings and using the TFI as the primary outcome. This trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme (PB-PG-0816-20,014) and registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14218416)." @default.
- W4308182451 created "2022-11-09" @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5003316836 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5013792340 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5019271003 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5027164251 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5036629717 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5043407054 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5055634988 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5060377511 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5069220303 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5070248257 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5077659318 @default.
- W4308182451 creator A5081827722 @default.
- W4308182451 date "2022-11-03" @default.
- W4308182451 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4308182451 title "Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids in patients with tinnitus and hearing loss: a randomised feasibility trial (THE HUSH Trial)" @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1531488625 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1585551982 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1751060652 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1845447069 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1885489887 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1964459106 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1969827432 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1976770755 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1979711714 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1992498333 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1994222210 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W1995055754 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2007076353 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2018968507 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2021955561 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2029491724 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2037248165 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2038262310 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2045675884 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2051883403 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2054921073 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2056829537 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2064489605 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2068334533 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2074369546 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2077427534 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2091823111 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2104019772 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2118249259 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2140215977 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2148398429 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2157353132 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2166281097 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2203446958 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2326345919 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2415005901 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2473786944 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2508065595 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2534656414 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2588720584 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2589186540 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2602918391 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2747626400 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2767728269 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2774924129 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2806240330 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2885350553 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2902904926 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2908315352 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W2997561398 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W3013021713 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W3029986514 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W4249561229 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W4366076260 @default.
- W4308182451 cites W4378882291 @default.
- W4308182451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01188-9" @default.
- W4308182451 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36329548" @default.
- W4308182451 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4308182451 type Work @default.
- W4308182451 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4308182451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5003316836 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5013792340 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5019271003 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5027164251 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5036629717 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5043407054 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5055634988 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5060377511 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5069220303 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5070248257 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5077659318 @default.
- W4308182451 hasAuthorship W4308182451A5081827722 @default.
- W4308182451 hasBestOaLocation W43081824511 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C2776992516 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C2780801066 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4308182451 hasConcept C548259974 @default.