FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4308249997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4308249997 abstract "It is possible that social media use can boost not just articles' social impact but the number of citations and academic influence as well. If a positive correlation between Twitter usage and citation metrics exists in the ophthalmology literature, it is important to broadcast this information to the ophthalmology community so they can use Twitter to increase academic engagement with their research. There has also been an increase in the number of articles available as open access. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the presence of an open-access citation advantage in the field of ophthalmology. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between Twitter mention and open access status on citation metrics in the ophthalmology literature.We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study comparing article citation metrics to Twitter mentions and open access status. We gathered data on ophthalmology research articles from the six highest-ranked ophthalmology journals published as part of a January 2019 issue. Data were collected in April 2022, 38 months after online publication. Data on citations for each article was based on Google Scholar and Scopus websites. The Altmetric Bookmarklet extension was used to determine the amount of social engagement each article received. The open-access status of each article was based on the status listed in its corresponding journal. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare social media engagement and open access status with the number of Google Scholar and Scopus citations.A total of 102 original research articles were analyzed. 89 (87.3%) articles received a Twitter mention. Articles tweeted at least once had a significantly higher Google Scholar score (27.2 +/- 4) compared to articles not tweeted (16.4 +/- 1.7; 1.7-fold increase, p<0.05). Likewise, the average Scopus score was significantly higher for tweeted articles (18.6 +/- 2.6) compared to articles not tweeted (11.8 +/- 1.6; 1.6-fold increase, p<0.05). Articles listed as open access had a significantly higher number of Twitter mentions (11.8 +/- 1.8) compared to articles that were not open access (5.6 +/- 0.7; 2.1-fold increase, p<0.05). Open-access articles also had higher citation scores compared to articles that are not open access, but this relationship was not statistically significant.This is the first study to evaluate the relationship between article Twitter mention and citation score in the field of ophthalmology. It demonstrates a significant positive correlation between the article Twitter mention and citation score and provides further evidence that social media engagement can be beneficial to the dissemination of academic information. Further studies on the relationship between social media engagement and article dissemination are warranted in the field of ophthalmology." @default.
• W4308249997 created "2022-11-09" @default.
• W4308249997 creator A5018255139 @default.
• W4308249997 creator A5028547358 @default.
• W4308249997 creator A5052238467 @default.
• W4308249997 creator A5061043154 @default.
• W4308249997 date "2022-11-03" @default.
• W4308249997 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W4308249997 title "Association Between Twitter Mention and Open-Access Status on Article Citation Metrics in the Field of Ophthalmology" @default.
• W4308249997 cites W1965964177 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W1969070712 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W1997299998 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2188907158 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2789995235 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2893736456 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2900727896 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2913788248 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2921179534 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W2947778969 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3087061429 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3161361048 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3165417168 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3174975695 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3187306072 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W3200171648 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W4225891786 @default.
• W4308249997 cites W4294316625 @default.
• W4308249997 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31048" @default.
• W4308249997 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36349069" @default.
• W4308249997 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4308249997 type Work @default.
• W4308249997 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4308249997 countsByYear W43082499972023 @default.
• W4308249997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4308249997 hasAuthorship W4308249997A5018255139 @default.
• W4308249997 hasAuthorship W4308249997A5028547358 @default.
• W4308249997 hasAuthorship W4308249997A5052238467 @default.
• W4308249997 hasAuthorship W4308249997A5061043154 @default.
• W4308249997 hasBestOaLocation W43082499971 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C2778407487 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C136764020 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C161191863 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C17744445 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C199539241 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C2778407487 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C2778805511 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C2779455604 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C2779473830 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C41008148 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C518677369 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C71924100 @default.
• W4308249997 hasConceptScore W4308249997C83867959 @default.
• W4308249997 hasLocation W43082499971 @default.
• W4308249997 hasLocation W43082499972 @default.
• W4308249997 hasLocation W43082499973 @default.
• W4308249997 hasOpenAccess W4308249997 @default.
• W4308249997 hasPrimaryLocation W43082499971 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W1890493318 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W2237146020 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W2766994457 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W2791108309 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W3094718339 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W3098993929 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W3162955726 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W4251784762 @default.
• W4308249997 hasRelatedWork W4299577055 @default.
• W4308249997 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4308249997 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4308249997 workType "article" @default.