Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4308456733> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4308456733 endingPage "2751" @default.
- W4308456733 startingPage "2751" @default.
- W4308456733 abstract "Competitive ability of cereals against segetal weeds depends among other things, on soil properties and the weather. Concerning cornflower (Centaurea cyanus L.), this issue is poorly recognized, as there are no reports on the impact of environmental conditions on the competitiveness of wheat against susceptible and resistant biotypes. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of site and weather conditions on the competitive effects between winter wheat (WW) and two cornflower biotypes, either florasulam and tribenuron-methyl resistant (R) or sensitive (S). The experiment was conducted in a replacement series model at six sites across Poland in three growing seasons. The competitive relations were determined on the basis of two indices, i.e., the relative biomass and the number of seeds produced by the tested plants. The relative yield of wheat and weed were plotted on graphs and fitted to one of five competition models. In addition, a competitive ratio (CR) was calculated on the basis of fresh plant biomass and the number of seeds. Correlation coefficients were determined between the length of the plant, yield, biomass, the number of seeds per plant, hydrothermal coefficient K, and soil texture. Biometric parameters of wheat for its competition with two cornflower biotypes were analyzed using canonical variate analysis (CVA). The number of days to WW emergence and the day-difference between WW and cornflower (B) emergence were also calculated. The environmental characteristics of the sites, i.e., hydrothermal coefficient K and soil texture, were used as categorizing variables. Drought generally favored the greater competitive ability of WW against B for both biomass accumulation and seed production. During the first season of the research (relatively dry), only in one case out of 12 cases cornflower was more competitive than wheat. In the second year of the experiment (dry season), the competition of WW against B for resources was lower. It depended more on the site than on the cornflower biotype or the proportion of plants in the mixture. Under high or optimal rainfalls (the third year of the experiment), the competitiveness of WW toward B was significantly lower than in years with rainfall deficiency. In addition, the ability of wheat competition against the weed may have been influenced by the earlier emergence of wheat than cornflower. Even though it was sown together with wheat, cornflower emerged 0–12 days later than the tested cereal. It was also noticed that wheat was more competitive on light soils against the herbicide-susceptible (S) biotype. In contrast, greater WW competitiveness was observed against herbicide-resistant (R) cornflower on heavy soils. In conclusion, winter wheat competitiveness against herbicide-resistant or herbicide-sensitive cornflower biotypes is significantly dependent on weather and soil conditions. It is therefore reasonable to study this phenomenon in more detail. It would also be interesting to learn more about the underground competition on varying soil types under different water availability." @default.
- W4308456733 created "2022-11-12" @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5037743612 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5038239534 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5043735634 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5049551662 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5051454968 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5054494764 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5062494089 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5068929181 @default.
- W4308456733 creator A5071629161 @default.
- W4308456733 date "2022-11-05" @default.
- W4308456733 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4308456733 title "Competition between Winter Wheat and Cornflower (Centaurea cyanus L.) Resistant or Susceptible to Herbicides under Varying Environmental Conditions in Poland" @default.
- W4308456733 cites W1967886993 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W1972291563 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W1975176570 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W1976928764 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W1984671939 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2009680563 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2053752559 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2077750842 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2077994574 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2094744724 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2139711371 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2144993454 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2165054945 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2174350594 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2277185475 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2522725031 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2586434064 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2756913665 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2792858070 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2804284592 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2890592907 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2902899217 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2919577138 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2973108538 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W2981287920 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3036435208 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3087322970 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3092022086 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3159764973 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3193550941 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3203259597 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3207995589 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W3215236621 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W4240943610 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W4247812060 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W4281401603 @default.
- W4308456733 cites W4283466580 @default.
- W4308456733 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112751" @default.
- W4308456733 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4308456733 type Work @default.
- W4308456733 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4308456733 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5037743612 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5038239534 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5043735634 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5049551662 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5051454968 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5054494764 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5062494089 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5068929181 @default.
- W4308456733 hasAuthorship W4308456733A5071629161 @default.
- W4308456733 hasBestOaLocation W43084567331 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C115540264 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C131892835 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C134121241 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C159750122 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C175963888 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C2775891814 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C2778064038 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C2779878721 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C3018661444 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C115540264 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C131892835 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C134121241 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C159750122 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C175963888 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C18903297 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C191897082 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C192562407 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C2775891814 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C2778064038 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C2779878721 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C3018661444 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C59822182 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C6557445 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C86803240 @default.
- W4308456733 hasConceptScore W4308456733C91306197 @default.