FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4308740092> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4308740092 endingPage "101115" @default.
• W4308740092 startingPage "101115" @default.
• W4308740092 abstract "Idioms differ from other forms of figurative language because of their semantic dimensions of familiarity (frequency of encounter), ambiguity (possibility to have a literal interpretation), decomposability (possibility of the idiom's words to assist in its figurative interpretation) and transparency (possibility to deduce the original metaphorical motivation of an idiomatic phrase from its literal analysis). A variety of approaches have been used to investigate the way idioms are processed in the brain. Studying clinical populations is one of them. Supporting evidence has been drawn from studies examining subjects suffering from aphasia, typically caused by lesions to a complex language network involving the main language areas in the Left Hemisphere (LH) of the brain. Patients with aphasia sometimes show selective impairment in idiom comprehension, implying that there are types of idioms, less impaired in comprehension, which do not depend solely on the LH of the brain. However, recent literature does not seem to agree in terms of when such preference exists and if the types of idioms and tasks employed play a crucial role. This study investigates idiom comprehension in aphasia and seeks to explore (1) the effect of idiomatic stimuli in terms of their semantic dimensions on the patients' language performance (2) a potential effect of the tasks employed on the patients' language performance. A systematic review was done following the PRISMA approach. Starting from an initial find of n = 457, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were retained for further analysis. Relevant information that was extracted included differences and similarities across studies, especially focusing on patient characteristics (age, type of aphasia, severity of aphasia, post onset period, handedness, type of lesion (i.e., single focal vs. multiple), lesion location, etiology and test used for diagnosis), stimuli (types of stimuli, stimuli's assessment, consistent use of terminology) and task employed (type of task, task options, modality of presentation and response, and types of measurements) and language comprehension patterns. Results indicated that studies in idiom comprehension in aphasia are characterized by great heterogeneity regarding the experimental task and the type of idiomatic stimuli employed. Heterogeneity in these key aspects, results in unclear interpretation of idiom comprehension patterns in aphasia across studies. In addition, the nature of idiomatic stimuli and more specifically their semantic dimensions were insufficiently described, and their descriptions were sometimes accompanied by terminological inconsistencies. Moreover, patient profiles were occasionally incomplete and more importantly, language comprehension patterns were reported after considering patients with aphasia as one homogenous group irrespective of their aphasic syndrome. Last, this review proposes recommendations for future research, focusing on patient profiles, experimental tasks and stimuli as well as the interpretation of language comprehension patterns." @default.
• W4308740092 created "2022-11-15" @default.
• W4308740092 creator A5017922299 @default.
• W4308740092 creator A5024399472 @default.
• W4308740092 creator A5041307489 @default.
• W4308740092 creator A5091878254 @default.
• W4308740092 date "2023-02-01" @default.
• W4308740092 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4308740092 title "A systematic review: Idiom comprehension in aphasia: The effects of stimuli and task type" @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1583071612 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1965532623 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1968739871 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1970422309 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1971982180 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1974415979 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1979959320 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1989092323 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W1993131419 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2003777867 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2004939592 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2011362338 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2021193858 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2024391302 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2026205517 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2029067296 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2040899986 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2052017327 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2065546921 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2071951647 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2074454796 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2076670729 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2082649433 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2089705257 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2090184226 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2100252945 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2102622533 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2113741499 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2121786367 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2126451592 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2128536155 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2130351579 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2140052184 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2145624268 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2146040148 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2154150421 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2161374186 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2168860328 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2311337582 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2344881764 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2594350875 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2792184485 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W2914677645 @default.
• W4308740092 cites W4251388527 @default.
• W4308740092 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101115" @default.
• W4308740092 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4308740092 type Work @default.
• W4308740092 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4308740092 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4308740092 hasAuthorship W4308740092A5017922299 @default.
• W4308740092 hasAuthorship W4308740092A5024399472 @default.
• W4308740092 hasAuthorship W4308740092A5041307489 @default.
• W4308740092 hasAuthorship W4308740092A5091878254 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C2776224158 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C2780882242 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C46182478 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C136197465 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C138885662 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C154945302 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C15744967 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C180747234 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C204321447 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C2776224158 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C2779422653 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C2780522230 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C2780882242 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C41008148 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C41895202 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C46182478 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C511192102 @default.
• W4308740092 hasConceptScore W4308740092C527412718 @default.
• W4308740092 hasFunder F4320322634 @default.
• W4308740092 hasLocation W43087400921 @default.
• W4308740092 hasOpenAccess W4308740092 @default.
• W4308740092 hasPrimaryLocation W43087400921 @default.
• W4308740092 hasRelatedWork W1965061222 @default.
• W4308740092 hasRelatedWork W1985717767 @default.

• next