FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309224339> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309224339 endingPage "883" @default.
• W4309224339 startingPage "882" @default.
• W4309224339 abstract "HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 15, No. 11Workflow for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guidance: MAXing the MLD? No AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextWorkflow for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guidance: MAXing the MLD? Louai Razzouk and Michael J. Attubato Louai RazzoukLouai Razzouk Correspondence to: Louai Razzouk, MD, MPH, Interventional Cardiology, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0306-6182 Interventional Cardiology, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.R., M.J.A.). Search for more papers by this author and Michael J. AttubatoMichael J. Attubato Interventional Cardiology, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (L.R., M.J.A.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published15 Nov 2022https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012608Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;15:882–883This article is a commentary on the followingDecision-Making During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights From the LightLab InitiativeWorkflow for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guidance: MAXing the MLD?. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 15(11), pp. 882–883FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.For Disclosures, see page 883.Correspondence to: Louai Razzouk, MD, MPH, Interventional Cardiology, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. Email louai.[email protected]orgReferences1. Smilowitz NR, Mohananey D, Razzouk L, Weisz G, Slater JN. Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the united states. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92:E410–E415. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27673CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Maehara A, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, Henry TD, Cox DA, Duffy PL, et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11:e006243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006243LinkGoogle Scholar3. Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, Bouma B, Bruining N, Cho JM, Chowdhary S, et al; International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT).Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: A report from the international working group for intravascular optical coherence tomography standardization and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59:1058–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Bergmark B, Dallan LAP, Pereira GTR, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, Buccola J, Wollmuth J, Lopez J, Spinelli J, Meinen J, et al. Decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention guided by optical coherence tomography: Insights from the lightlab initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022; 15:e011851. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.011851LinkGoogle Scholar5. Ali ZA, Karimi Galougahi K, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Shlofmitz RA, Mattesini A. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions. EuroIntervention. 2021; 17:e105–e123. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Romagnoli E, Ramazzotti V, Burzotta F, Gatto L, Marco V, Paoletti G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Alfonso F, Crea F, Trani C, et al; CLI-OPCI Project Investigators.Definition of optimal optical coherence tomography-based stent expansion criteria: In-stent minimum lumen area versus residual stent underexpansion. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022; 15:e011496. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011496LinkGoogle Scholar7. Leistner DM, Riedel M, Steinbeck L, Stahli BE, Frohlich GM, Lauten A, Skurk C, Mochmann HC, Lubking L, Rauch-Krohnert U, et al. Real-time optical coherence tomography coregistration with angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention-impact on physician decision-making: the optico-integration study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92:30–37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27313CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, Genereux P, Nichols M, Jenkins P, Witzenbichler B, et al. Comparison of stent expansion guided by optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound: The ilumien ii study (observational study of optical coherence tomography [oct] in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve [ffr] and percutaneous coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8:1704–1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, Guagliumi G, Meraj PM, Alfonso F, Samady H, et al; ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI Investigators.Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMAL PCI): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388:2618–2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Patel MR, Jeremias A, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Zhang Z, Schneider J, Tang K, Talwar S, Marques K, Shammas NW, et al. 1-year outcomes of blinded physiological assessment of residual ischemia after successful PCI: define PCI trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022; 15:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.042CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Wijns W, Shite J, Jones MR, Lee SW, Price MJ, Fabbiocchi F, Barbato E, Akasaka T, Bezerra H, Holmes D. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: Ilumien i study. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:3346–3355. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Ali Z, Landmesser U, Karimi Galougahi K, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Shlofmitz RA, Guagliumi G, Price MJ, Hill JM, Akasaka T, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI – design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI. EuroIntervention. 2021; 16:1092–1099. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00501CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesDecision-Making During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights From the LightLab InitiativeBrian Bergmark, et al. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;15:872-881 November 2022Vol 15, Issue 11 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2022 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012608PMID: 36378740 Originally publishedNovember 15, 2022 Keywordsintravascular imagingpercutaneous coronary interventionEditorialsintravascular ultrasoundcoronary angiographyrevascularizationoptical coherence tomographyPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCatheter-Based Coronary and Valvular InterventionsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention" @default.
• W4309224339 created "2022-11-24" @default.
• W4309224339 creator A5014072369 @default.
• W4309224339 creator A5038203776 @default.
• W4309224339 date "2022-11-01" @default.
• W4309224339 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4309224339 title "Workflow for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guidance: MAXing the MLD?" @default.
• W4309224339 cites W1956305767 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2143100051 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2216278789 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2545173169 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2757764013 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2883961005 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W2901021020 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W3082472855 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W3172120087 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W4205827616 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W4296515350 @default.
• W4309224339 cites W4309083872 @default.
• W4309224339 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.122.012608" @default.
• W4309224339 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36378740" @default.
• W4309224339 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4309224339 type Work @default.
• W4309224339 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4309224339 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309224339 hasAuthorship W4309224339A5014072369 @default.
• W4309224339 hasAuthorship W4309224339A5038203776 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C165556158 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C2778818243 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C2780400711 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C2780596892 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C118552586 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C126322002 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C126838900 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C162324750 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C164705383 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C165556158 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C19527891 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C27415008 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C2778818243 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C2780400711 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C2780596892 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C2780813298 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C500558357 @default.
• W4309224339 hasConceptScore W4309224339C71924100 @default.
• W4309224339 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W4309224339 hasLocation W43092243391 @default.
• W4309224339 hasLocation W43092243392 @default.
• W4309224339 hasOpenAccess W4309224339 @default.
• W4309224339 hasPrimaryLocation W43092243391 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2034981248 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2040031864 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2395600221 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2399063111 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2761804449 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2793369705 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W3013775135 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W3139881666 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W4231555111 @default.
• W4309224339 hasRelatedWork W2945071889 @default.
• W4309224339 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W4309224339 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4309224339 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4309224339 workType "article" @default.