Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309488675> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 items per page.
- W4309488675 endingPage "S5" @default.
- W4309488675 startingPage "S5" @default.
- W4309488675 abstract "Background: The ABS audit of 17,045 cancers indicates that re-excision is required in 20% of invasive cancers and up to 30% of non-invasive DCIS to clear margins after Breast Conservation(BCS). A further 8% of patients undergo a third procedure to convert to a mastectomy. Reducing the need for further operations benefits patients. To determine if the use of the MarginProbe, a CE device on the removed surgical specimen margin, (after tumour excision and tissue specimen radiography of a breast cancer (with surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) or DCIS) reduces rates of surgical re-excision operations, when compared to standard practice. we performed a multicentre UK randomised controlled trial. We aimed to compare the total number of re-excision procedures required following BCS because of positive margins less than 1 mm (circumferentially) and the number of patients presenting with excision margins greater than 1 mm circumferentially clear after BCS, judged by histopathological assessment. Additionally we determined Quality of life and health related facility measures (EQ5D) between patient groups. The Trial randomised women aged 18 to 90 years, with early cancer larger than 1.5 cm (invasive breast cancer with surrounding DCIS or DCIS alone, histologically diagnosed by core biopsy), scheduled to undergo BCS. All 10 UK centres agreed the protocol and were proctored (trained in the use of the device) for their first 5 cases. Results: In total 467 patients were randomised by block allocation, 242 underwent marginprobe assessment intraoperatively and 225 no probe assessment (control). Seventyeight patients required a repeat lumpectomy/excision within 9 months (40 MarginProbe & 38 Control). DCIS, rexcision rate was 20.5% and Invasive cancer was 13.5%.Re-excision rates did not differ between the groups (39/94 = 41.5% MarginProbe & 35/89 = 39.3% Control patients with closest margin width <1 mm had re-excision within 9 months). However 0.7% MarginProbe & 2.2% Control patients with closest margin width >1 mm had re-excision within 9 months. Rexcision rate in the Marginprobe arm varied across centres from 6.5 to 33.3% (Highest Centre rexcision rate vs lowest centre p = 0.0029) and controls from 7.5%–45%. There was no difference in the tissue weight excised between the treatment groups. Neither Body Image or Sexual Adjustment sub-scales at 9 months differed between the treatment groups, after adjusting for baseline scores FACT-B TOI Quality of Life scores between patients who had re-excision & those that didn’t differ, at any of the follow-up time points (1,3,9 months). Conclusion: Due to variation in margin clearance between centres, no effect of marginprobe device use on clearance was identified. Although the idea of intraoperative testing of margins to prevent recurrence appealed to patients, device use did not impact outcomes. No conflict of interest." @default.
- W4309488675 created "2022-11-28" @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5026280091 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5028811863 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5031771805 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5034031394 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5043964292 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5045500872 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5049348549 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5054985264 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5055304521 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5069471613 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5071040536 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5075588032 @default.
- W4309488675 creator A5084373654 @default.
- W4309488675 date "2022-11-01" @default.
- W4309488675 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
- W4309488675 title "Does the use of an Intraoperative device to assess margins reduce need for reexcison after breast conserving surgery: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial" @default.
- W4309488675 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(22)01358-2" @default.
- W4309488675 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4309488675 type Work @default.
- W4309488675 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4309488675 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5026280091 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5028811863 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5031771805 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5034031394 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5043964292 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5045500872 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5049348549 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5054985264 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5055304521 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5069471613 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5071040536 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5075588032 @default.
- W4309488675 hasAuthorship W4309488675A5084373654 @default.
- W4309488675 hasBestOaLocation W43094886751 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2777757722 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2778303017 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2779572924 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2780862961 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C2781467025 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C121608353 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C126322002 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C126838900 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C141071460 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C168563851 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2775934546 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2777757722 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2778303017 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2779572924 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2780862961 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C2781467025 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C530470458 @default.
- W4309488675 hasConceptScore W4309488675C71924100 @default.
- W4309488675 hasLocation W43094886751 @default.
- W4309488675 hasOpenAccess W4309488675 @default.
- W4309488675 hasPrimaryLocation W43094886751 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W13747749 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W174947267 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W1988245464 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2009413874 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2009584097 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2013889994 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2028123175 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2074391593 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W2116133657 @default.
- W4309488675 hasRelatedWork W4242438590 @default.
- W4309488675 hasVolume "175" @default.
- W4309488675 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4309488675 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4309488675 workType "article" @default.