FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309516788> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309516788 endingPage "164" @default.
• W4309516788 startingPage "157" @default.
• W4309516788 abstract "Abstract Background Fragment reattachment is the recommended treatment modality in uncomplicated crown fractures. There is a paucity of literature regarding the mechanisms responsible for increased resistance to fracture after fragment rehydration in such cases. Hence, the aim of this proof‐of‐concept study was to decipher the microscopic changes in the penetration characteristics of resin in tooth fragments after different rehydration protocols. Material and Methods Sixty bovine incisors free of structural deformities were fractured as per a standard protocol and the fragments were stored in saline at 4°C. They were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 20)—Group 1: negative‐control, no‐rehydration, Group 2: rehydration by immersion in distilled water for 15 min, Group 3: rehydration by humidification for 15 min. They were subjected to the “experimental bonding protocol” using an eighth‐generation bonding agent mixed with rhodamine‐B dye. The samples were subjected to decalcification and sectioned into cubical blocks (2 × 2 × 2 mm 3 ). They were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned by an ultramicrotome and evaluated by using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The depths and width of the resin tags were assessed by image analysis software, and the number of tags was counted manually by blinded evaluators. Statistical analysis was done with Stata‐14. Results The depth of penetration of the resin tags was greatest in Group 2 (927.81 ± 280.38 μm) followed by Group 3 (902.03 ± 371.85 μm) and Group 1 (287.74 ± 124.80 μm). Similarly, the width of the penetrated resin tags was greatest in Group 2 (58.29 ± 21.15), followed by Group 3 (35.53 ± 22.15) and Group 1 (23.89 ± 6.88). The number of resin tags in the majority of the samples in Group 1 had less than 25 tags (65%), whereas there were more than 25 tags in Group 2 (70%) and Group 3 (75%). These differences were statistically significant ( p < .05). Conclusion The resin penetration, as observed by the number of tags and their depth and width, was significantly affected by the rehydration of the fragments. The fragments rehydrated in the distilled water had greater penetration of resin tags than those rehydrated in a humidification chamber." @default.
• W4309516788 created "2022-11-28" @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5004199209 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5005981100 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5026969362 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5045711883 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5060862843 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5071364463 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5076270082 @default.
• W4309516788 creator A5091041816 @default.
• W4309516788 date "2022-11-21" @default.
• W4309516788 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4309516788 title "Evaluation of two rehydration protocols for fractured tooth fragments for characteristics of penetration of resin tags using confocal laser scanning microscopy" @default.
• W4309516788 cites W1966255911 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2009947656 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2013536111 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2014994935 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2035183856 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2045825411 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2084221059 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2605973678 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2790956710 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2791797632 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2792543502 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2808252499 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W2933629827 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3004059400 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3030981014 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3163619424 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3168622572 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3200287411 @default.
• W4309516788 cites W3216839849 @default.
• W4309516788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12807" @default.
• W4309516788 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36409272" @default.
• W4309516788 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4309516788 type Work @default.
• W4309516788 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4309516788 countsByYear W43095167882023 @default.
• W4309516788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5004199209 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5005981100 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5026969362 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5045711883 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5060862843 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5071364463 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5076270082 @default.
• W4309516788 hasAuthorship W4309516788A5091041816 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C136009344 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C155977592 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C26905121 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C2779429693 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C2910267089 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C2988511132 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C80107235 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConcept C88412794 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C120665830 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C121332964 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C136009344 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C136229726 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C155977592 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C159985019 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C185592680 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C192562407 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C199343813 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C26771246 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C26905121 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C2779429693 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C2910267089 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C2988511132 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C33923547 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C42475967 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C43617362 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C71924100 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C80107235 @default.
• W4309516788 hasConceptScore W4309516788C88412794 @default.
• W4309516788 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4309516788 hasLocation W43095167881 @default.
• W4309516788 hasLocation W43095167882 @default.
• W4309516788 hasOpenAccess W4309516788 @default.
• W4309516788 hasPrimaryLocation W43095167881 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W1996208092 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W2041117063 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W2083648294 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W2802070872 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W2890827205 @default.
• W4309516788 hasRelatedWork W2921169788 @default.

• next