FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309518822> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309518822 endingPage "103479" @default.
• W4309518822 startingPage "103479" @default.
• W4309518822 abstract "Considering the extensive use of smartphones in current societies, web-based applications could be considered as a new option for patient follow-up in surgery. By means of such tool, automated and periodic questionnaires could improve the rigor, accuracy and the comprehensiveness of postoperative monitoring, as well as early detection of complications, especially in the current context of evolving ambulatory surgery. The web-based surveys would improve the quality of immediate postoperative monitoring. For 7 months, we included all patients who underwent outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. After preoperative randomization, each patient was asked postoperatively to complete either paper-based forms or digital questionnaires via a website (Orthense.com®, Digikare Inc. Blagnac, France). Both media (i.e. paper and digital) followed the same postoperative agenda (i.e., D + 3, D + 14, D + 28, D + 45, D + 90) and had the same content, including pain and discomfort assessments, functional scores (i.e. Shoulder subjective value, simple shoulder test and auto-constant scores). The main objective was to investigate the quality of postoperative follow-up after outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery, using either printed questionnaires or web-based surveys. The hypothesis was that using a web-based survey would result in greater response rates and increased patient satisfaction regarding follow-up. Primary outcomes were questionnaire response rates at D + 45 and D + 90, while secondary outcomes were overall response rates, patient recommendation for the monitoring medium and overall patient satisfaction regarding their follow-up using the net promoter score (NPS). Among the 59 consecutive patients who were included, there were 27 females and 26 males with a mean age of 57 ± 10.2 years; 27 patients completed the web-based survey (Group A) and 26 patients answered paper-based questionnaires (Group B). Regarding the D + 45 questionnaire, response rates were 85.2% (n = 23) in group A and 42.3% (n = 11) in group B (p = .005); a similar significant difference was observed regarding the D + 90 questionnaire, with response rates of 70.4% and 34.6%, respectively (p = .027). The mean NPS for the survey was 10 in Group A and 8.29 in Group B (p = .016). Overall, satisfaction regarding postoperative care did not differ between the two groups. Compared to traditional paper-based forms, web-based surveys appear to increase patient adherence to short-term postoperative monitoring. If these findings were to be confirmed in long-term follow-up, such straightforward and cost-effective tool could be of great use in clinical care and research. I; Randomized controlled clinical trial." @default.
• W4309518822 created "2022-11-28" @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5026669045 @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5037905336 @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5038321368 @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5052269276 @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5067666333 @default.
• W4309518822 creator A5079663462 @default.
• W4309518822 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4309518822 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4309518822 title "Do web-based follow-up surveys have a better response rate than traditional paper-based questionnaires following outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W4309518822 cites W1512623463 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W1992691978 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W1995335808 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2085638643 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2089580658 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2099928264 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2102963604 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2119383015 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2145225199 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2147236250 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2148011748 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2150844702 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2163189493 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2334148708 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2530795630 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2598817971 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2600487141 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2626947701 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2794270853 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2886358375 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2905571084 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2921255057 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2986766191 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W2996939726 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W3020904318 @default.
• W4309518822 cites W4205638069 @default.
• W4309518822 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103479" @default.
• W4309518822 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36403889" @default.
• W4309518822 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4309518822 type Work @default.
• W4309518822 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4309518822 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5026669045 @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5037905336 @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5038321368 @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5052269276 @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5067666333 @default.
• W4309518822 hasAuthorship W4309518822A5079663462 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2776887337 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2779100052 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C35785553 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C141071460 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C151730666 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C168563851 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C1862650 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C204243189 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2775944032 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2776511800 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2776887337 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2777267654 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2779100052 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C2779343474 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C35785553 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C71924100 @default.
• W4309518822 hasConceptScore W4309518822C86803240 @default.
• W4309518822 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4309518822 hasLocation W43095188221 @default.
• W4309518822 hasLocation W43095188222 @default.
• W4309518822 hasOpenAccess W4309518822 @default.
• W4309518822 hasPrimaryLocation W43095188221 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W1967550664 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W2081075877 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W2103067684 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W2162707291 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W2963200905 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W3126628130 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W3159466213 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W4309518822 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W4309869347 @default.
• W4309518822 hasRelatedWork W4317868882 @default.
• W4309518822 hasVolume "109" @default.
• W4309518822 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4309518822 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4309518822 workType "article" @default.