FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309618061> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309618061 endingPage "e067044" @default.
• W4309618061 startingPage "e067044" @default.
• W4309618061 abstract "Objectives Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide insight into patients’ experienced health and needs, and can improve patient–professional communication. However, little is known about how to discuss PROM results. This study aimed to provide in-depth knowledge of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences with and perspectives on discussing PROM results as part of routine dialysis care. Design A qualitative study was performed using an interpretive description approach. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 patients and healthcare professionals. Interviews focused on general and specific situations (eg, addressing sensitive topics or when no medical treatment is available). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively using thematic analysis. Setting Participants were purposively sampled from eight dialysis centres across the Netherlands. Participants Interviews were conducted with 10 patients receiving dialysis treatment and 12 healthcare professionals (nephrologists and nurses). Results Patients and healthcare professionals provided practical guidance for optimal discussion about PROM results. First, patients and healthcare professionals emphasised that PROM results should always be discussed and indicated how to create a suitable setting, adequately prepare, deal with time constraints and use PROMs as a tool for personalised holistic consultations. Second, patients should actively participate and healthcare professionals should take a guiding role. A trusting patient–professional relationship was considered a prerequisite and patient–professional interaction was described as a collaboration in which both contribute their knowledge, experiences and ideas. Third, follow-up after discussing PROM results was considered important, including evaluations and actions (eg, symptom management) structurally embedded into the multidisciplinary treatment process. These general themes also applied to the specific situations, for example: results should also be discussed when no medical treatment is available. Though, healthcare professionals were expected to take more initiative and a leading role when discussing sensitive topics. Conclusions This study provides insight into how to organise and conduct conversations about PROM results and lays the foundation for training healthcare professionals to optimally discuss PROM results in routine nephrology care. Further research is needed to provide guidance on follow-up actions in response to specific PROM results." @default.
• W4309618061 created "2022-11-28" @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5013893283 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5021631280 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5022085293 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5035695278 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5040848501 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5045403331 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5074083805 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5075059076 @default.
• W4309618061 creator A5078810330 @default.
• W4309618061 date "2022-11-01" @default.
• W4309618061 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4309618061 title "Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study" @default.
• W4309618061 cites W1551675929 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W1978013793 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W1986310676 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W1991640972 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2011590376 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2031030954 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2035718426 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2041927436 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2053689306 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2066797995 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2104000083 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2132645452 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2138456319 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2154903785 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2159210825 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2172151487 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2292884806 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2293248097 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2429720795 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2581606077 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2606752218 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2625899126 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2802951275 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2889300239 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2894826729 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2949788847 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2952480411 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2971453766 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W2973065356 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3004910418 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3008705483 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3048333295 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3081040795 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3088463461 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3112714684 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3132748845 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3153473602 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3169645032 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3194355198 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W3200697338 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W4220892697 @default.
• W4309618061 cites W4224300845 @default.
• W4309618061 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067044" @default.
• W4309618061 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36396312" @default.
• W4309618061 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4309618061 type Work @default.
• W4309618061 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4309618061 countsByYear W43096180612023 @default.
• W4309618061 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5013893283 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5021631280 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5022085293 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5035695278 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5040848501 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5045403331 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5074083805 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5075059076 @default.
• W4309618061 hasAuthorship W4309618061A5078810330 @default.
• W4309618061 hasBestOaLocation W43096180611 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C3019806175 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C131872663 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C144024400 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C159110408 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C160735492 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C162324750 @default.
• W4309618061 hasConceptScore W4309618061C190248442 @default.

• next