FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309857256> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309857256 abstract "Background Acupuncture and moxibustion have been widely used in the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). But the evidence that acupuncture and moxibustion for IBS reduction of symptom severity and abdominal pain, and improvement of quality of life is scarce. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), and unpublished sources were searched from inception until June 30, 2022. The quality of RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The strength of the evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to determine whether the participants in the included trials had reached optimal information size and whether the cumulative data was adequately powered to evaluate outcomes. Results A total of 31 RCTs were included. Acupuncture helped reduce the severity of symptoms more than pharmaceutical drugs (MD, −35.45; 95% CI, −48.21 to −22.68; I 2 = 71%). TSA showed the cumulative Z score crossed O'Brien-Fleming alpha-spending significance boundaries. Acupuncture wasn't associated with symptom severity reduction (SMD, 0.03, 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.31, I 2 = 46%), but exhibited therapeutic benefits on abdominal pain (SMD, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.01; I 2 = 8%) compared to sham acupuncture. Moxibustion show therapeutic benefits compared to sham moxibustion on symptom severity (SMD, −3.46, 95% CI, −5.66 to −1.27, I 2 = 95%) and abdominal pain (SMD, −2.74, 95% CI, −4.81 to −0.67, I 2 = 96%). Acupuncture (SMD, −0.46; 95% CI, −0.68 to −0.24; I 2 = 47%) and the combination of acupuncture and moxibustion (SMD, −2.00; 95% CI, −3.04 to −0.96; I 2 = 90%) showed more benefit for abdominal pain compared to pharmacological medications as well as shams. Acupuncture (MD, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.46–7.67; I 2 = 79%) and moxibustion (MD, 6.97; 95% CI, 5.78–8.16; I 2 = 21%) were more likely to improve quality of life than pharmaceutical drugs. Conclusion Acupuncture and/or moxibustion are beneficial for symptom severity, abdominal pain and quality of life in IBS. However, in sham control trials, acupuncture hasn't exhibited robust and stable evidence, and moxibustion's results show great heterogeneity. Hence, more rigorous sham control trials of acupuncture or moxibustion are necessary. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=262118 , identifier CRD42021262118." @default.
• W4309857256 created "2022-11-29" @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5009469177 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5017456524 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5021269923 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5026725055 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5048898651 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5074425597 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5076564457 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5079573376 @default.
• W4309857256 creator A5082515334 @default.
• W4309857256 date "2022-11-24" @default.
• W4309857256 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4309857256 title "Clinical evidence of acupuncture and moxibustion for irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W4309857256 cites W116834197 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W162596831 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W1660640439 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W1971441597 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W1990925727 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W1994545656 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W1996366489 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2002324192 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2003509332 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2005091315 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2017321847 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2022830174 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2135740385 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2160767876 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2271206729 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2369202906 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2418820451 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2535150227 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2535521037 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2562153052 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2592690341 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2913348215 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2924805630 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2978149037 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2979809541 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2989406672 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2989616299 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W2996794032 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W3033382722 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W3042758557 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W3188570446 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W3199197029 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4211073917 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4212807087 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4213429816 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4220883419 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4225515090 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4290744554 @default.
• W4309857256 cites W4296277377 @default.
• W4309857256 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022145" @default.
• W4309857256 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36589968" @default.
• W4309857256 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4309857256 type Work @default.
• W4309857256 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W4309857256 countsByYear W43098572562023 @default.
• W4309857256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5009469177 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5017456524 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5021269923 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5026725055 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5048898651 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5074425597 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5076564457 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5079573376 @default.
• W4309857256 hasAuthorship W4309857256A5082515334 @default.
• W4309857256 hasBestOaLocation W43098572561 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C2777674692 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C2778271842 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C556039675 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C56837625 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C126322002 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C142724271 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C168563851 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C17744445 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C1862650 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C199539241 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C204787440 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C2776478404 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C2777674692 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C2778271842 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C2779473830 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C556039675 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C56837625 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C71924100 @default.
• W4309857256 hasConceptScore W4309857256C95190672 @default.

• next