FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309862308> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4309862308 endingPage "520" @default.
• W4309862308 startingPage "506" @default.
• W4309862308 abstract "Abstract Aim This paper reports an integrative review of international health literature that discusses health equity in relation to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Background Healthcare professionals (HCPs), policy makers, and decision makers rely on sound empirical evidence to make fiscally responsible and appropriate decisions about the allocation of health resources and health service delivery. CPGs provide statements and recommendations that aim to standardize care with an implicit goal of achieving equity of care among diverse populations. Developers of CPGs must be careful not to exacerbate inequity when making recommendations. As such, it is important to determine how equity is discussed within the context of CPGs. Design This integrative review was conducted according to integrative review methods as outlined by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), and Toronto and Remington (2020). These authors outlined a systematic process for the identification of relevant literature across health disciplines to examine the state of knowledge pertaining to a phenomenon such as health equity. Search Methods The computerized databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched using a combination of keywords. Search parameters included international peer‐reviewed published, full‐text, English language articles, editorials, and reports over the last decade (January 2011 to February 2022). A reference search of included articles was conducted to identify any additional articles. Dissertations and theses were not included. Search Outcome A total of 139 peer‐reviewed English language articles were identified. Results The findings of this review revealed five main ways in which health equity is in context of CPGs including if they target or exacerbate inequity among disadvantaged populations, equity and CPG development, implementation, and evaluation, and checklists and tools to assist developers and users of CPG to consider equity. Although critical appraisal tools exist to assist users of CPGs assess and to evaluate how well CPGs address issues of equity, the definition of equity and how CPG development panels should incorporate and articulate it remains unclear and haphazard. As such, recommendations intended to be implemented by HCPs to optimize health equity remains diverse and unclear. Conclusion The way equity is discussed within the reviewed health literature has implications for their uptake by and utility for HCPs. The ability of HCPs to implement CPGs may be hindered without an appreciation and integration of equity considerations across the various phases of CPG conceptualization, development, implementation, and evaluation, and their relevance and appropriateness to diverse geographic and socioeconomic contexts with variable access to health human resources and services. This situation could be improved if equity were more clearly articulated within all aspects of the CPG process. Clinical Relevance Understanding how equity is discussed in the literature relative to CPGs has implications for their uptake by and utility for HCPs in their goal of providing equitable health care. Successful implementation of CPGs with consideration equity could be improved if equity were more clearly articulated within all aspects of the CPG process including conceptualization, development, implementation, and evaluation." @default.
• W4309862308 created "2022-11-29" @default.
• W4309862308 creator A5014110146 @default.
• W4309862308 creator A5031313830 @default.
• W4309862308 creator A5047296424 @default.
• W4309862308 creator A5058207737 @default.
• W4309862308 creator A5060891081 @default.
• W4309862308 date "2022-11-23" @default.
• W4309862308 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4309862308 title "Representations of clinical practice guidelines and health equity in healthcare literature: An integrative review" @default.
• W4309862308 cites W114929610 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W1636328530 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W1963629350 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2008948652 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2013953208 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W202007523 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2024257280 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2027787687 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2051953497 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2052525713 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2054190773 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2059067732 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2083463516 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2090317408 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2096833944 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2115710612 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2128680561 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2134828373 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2144231045 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2145097846 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2147359506 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2150798407 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W21514708 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2157282259 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2160757315 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2161511809 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2169569461 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2283450481 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2291816660 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2301573272 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2321560061 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2466926363 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2605783173 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2607456113 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2613538222 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2734957773 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2746249398 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2764076400 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2765393790 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2766233621 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2768285194 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2784085208 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2792520912 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2803579818 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2887021352 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W2991596133 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W3001117780 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W3006211110 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W3096663213 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W3175982262 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W3205507353 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W4210293275 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W4241275127 @default.
• W4309862308 cites W4251298919 @default.
• W4309862308 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12847" @default.
• W4309862308 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36419399" @default.
• W4309862308 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4309862308 type Work @default.
• W4309862308 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4309862308 countsByYear W43098623082023 @default.
• W4309862308 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4309862308 hasAuthorship W4309862308A5014110146 @default.
• W4309862308 hasAuthorship W4309862308A5031313830 @default.
• W4309862308 hasAuthorship W4309862308A5047296424 @default.
• W4309862308 hasAuthorship W4309862308A5058207737 @default.
• W4309862308 hasAuthorship W4309862308A5060891081 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C2250968 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C61904560 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConceptScore W4309862308C138816342 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConceptScore W4309862308C151730666 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConceptScore W4309862308C15744967 @default.
• W4309862308 hasConceptScore W4309862308C159110408 @default.

• next