Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4309879454> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W4309879454 endingPage "325" @default.
- W4309879454 startingPage "323" @default.
- W4309879454 abstract "In this editorial, I want to focus on a dilemma: Is the citation of a paper much better than accessing and reading it? What is more important for science in real life? A citation may be relevant, but accessing a journal’s article could be crucial if it has some application. Our inclusion in Crossref has permitted us to determine the communicational impact of the published articles as a measure of their reading extension, revealing a monthly mean of 1050 readings this year. As we expected, most of the readings came from COVID-19 issues and review articles. Another metric of our publications is related to the number of visitors to our journal web page: in 2021, we received 1300 visits. On the other hand, our pres-ence in WoS and Scopus has shown a modest impact on citations, which is more evident in WoS. About different papers published on the subject, Hirsh 1 pointed out that the journal’s impact increases if the readers pay more attention to review articles instead of primary re-search articles. The H-index is another metric used to determine the journal’s impact based on the number of citations. According to Scopus, our journal has an H-index of 22. Jeang 2 mentions, in his article about the H-Index and the differences between the frequency of citations and accessing, that a higher number of readings can produce an increased number of citations. But conversely, a high number of citations of one article does not imply a high number of readings. Finally, in the work of Shanta et al. 3 they concluded that the accurate measurement of the impact of a paper is the number of times a medical practitioner uses the information contained in that paper to improve the quality of the treatment. For our part, we will advocate striving to ensure that the works we publish have sufficient quality to be cited but also to be presented to arouse interest in its reading and their results put into practice." @default.
- W4309879454 created "2022-11-29" @default.
- W4309879454 creator A5027558918 @default.
- W4309879454 date "2022-11-11" @default.
- W4309879454 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W4309879454 title "EDITORIAL. Leer versus citar un trabajo. Análisis de nuestras publicaciones en los últimos años." @default.
- W4309879454 cites W1982218215 @default.
- W4309879454 cites W2048580124 @default.
- W4309879454 cites W2051084968 @default.
- W4309879454 doi "https://doi.org/10.54817/ic.v63n4a00" @default.
- W4309879454 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4309879454 type Work @default.
- W4309879454 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4309879454 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4309879454 hasAuthorship W4309879454A5027558918 @default.
- W4309879454 hasBestOaLocation W43098794541 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C136764020 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C161191863 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C17744445 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C199539241 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2524010 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2777382242 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2777855551 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2778496695 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2778805511 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2779455604 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C2779473830 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C3020774429 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C33923547 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C41008148 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C554936623 @default.
- W4309879454 hasConceptScore W4309879454C83867959 @default.
- W4309879454 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W4309879454 hasLocation W43098794541 @default.
- W4309879454 hasOpenAccess W4309879454 @default.
- W4309879454 hasPrimaryLocation W43098794541 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W1890493318 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W2148583685 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W2463142407 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W2785788960 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W2883040153 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W3167054959 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W3196883932 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W4294176056 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W1834132772 @default.
- W4309879454 hasRelatedWork W2611629760 @default.
- W4309879454 hasVolume "63" @default.
- W4309879454 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4309879454 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4309879454 workType "article" @default.