FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4310251567> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4310251567 endingPage "459" @default.
• W4310251567 startingPage "448" @default.
• W4310251567 abstract "Therapy of very severe osteoporotic compression fractures (VSOVCF) has been a growing challenge for spine surgeons. Opinions vary regarding the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of VSOVCF and which internal fixation method is more effective is still under debate, and research on this topic is lacking. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of various pedicle screw fixation methods for treating VSOVCF.This single-center retrospective comparative study was conducted between January 2015 and September 2020. Two hundred and one patients were divided into six groups according to different surgical methods: 45 patients underwent long-segment fixation (Group 1); 39 underwent short-segment fixation (Group 2); 30 received long-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 3); 32 received short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4); 29 had long-segment fixation combined with kyphoplasty (PKP) (Group 5); and 26 cases had short-segment fixation combined with PKP (Group 6). The clinical records were reviewed and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were used for clinical evaluation. The vertebral height (VH), fractured vertebral body height (FVBH), and Cobb's angle were objectively calculated and analyzed on lateral plain radiographs. Student's t-tests and one-way ANOVA among groups were conducted to analyze the continuous, and the chi-squared test was used to compare the dichotomous or categorical variables. The difference was considered statistically significant when the P-value was less than 0.05.The six groups had similar distributions in age, gender, course of the disease, follow-up period, and injured level. In the postoperative assessment of the VAS score, the surgical intervention most likely to rank first in terms of pain relief was the short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4). For the functional evaluation, the surgical intervention that is most likely to rank first in terms of ODI score was a short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4), followed by long-segment fixation (Group 1). The long-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws was the first-ranked surgical intervention for the maintenance of Cobb's angle and vertebral height, whereas the short-segment fixation performed the worst. The highest overall complication rate was in Group 6 with an incidence of 42.3% (11/26), followed by Group 2 with an incidence of 38.5% (15/39).For the treatment of VSOVCF, the short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws is the most effective and optimal procedure, and should be used as the preferred surgical method if surgeons are proficient in using cemented screws; otherwise, directly and unquestionably use long-segment fixation to achieve satisfactory clinical results." @default.
• W4310251567 created "2022-11-30" @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5005135386 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5006744059 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5015347623 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5032423805 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5036369920 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5037263349 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5048140659 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5070005264 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5070100940 @default.
• W4310251567 creator A5091870178 @default.
• W4310251567 date "2022-11-29" @default.
• W4310251567 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4310251567 title "Study on the Optimal Surgical Scheme for Very Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures" @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2004419003 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2012497723 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2022832610 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2024929124 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2037861546 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2062065598 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2087303209 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2090507006 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2098686920 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2172244876 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2289133975 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2428109599 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2431692212 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2604546486 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2766114618 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2767950635 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2780448645 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2788057143 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2791861740 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2801610967 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2807374157 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2888015494 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2889973750 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2902400447 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2906853630 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2946490232 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W2995720065 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W3012928689 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W3028553436 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W3088450528 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W3093177491 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W3166250334 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W4212941985 @default.
• W4310251567 cites W4224231950 @default.
• W4310251567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13609" @default.
• W4310251567 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36444956" @default.
• W4310251567 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4310251567 type Work @default.
• W4310251567 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4310251567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5005135386 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5006744059 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5015347623 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5032423805 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5036369920 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5037263349 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5048140659 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5070005264 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5070100940 @default.
• W4310251567 hasAuthorship W4310251567A5091870178 @default.
• W4310251567 hasBestOaLocation W43102515671 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C126838900 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C141071460 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C14184104 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C142724271 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C146249460 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C167135981 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C178910020 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C204787440 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C2775998654 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C2780907711 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C2908647359 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C29694066 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C36454342 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C71924100 @default.
• W4310251567 hasConceptScore W4310251567C99454951 @default.
• W4310251567 hasFunder F4320321001 @default.
• W4310251567 hasIssue "2" @default.

• next