FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4310353782> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4310353782 abstract "To most students the internal machinations of the university are a black box, very rarely are they permitted to see behind the curtain. While in many areas academia has started to move away from the sage-on-the-stage mentality, much of what is done still does not involve the students’ voice. While they have the opportunity to provide feedback on individual subjects, the structure of students’ whole degrees are still the domain of the sage.At the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) we are reviewing our professional practice program for engineering. This program sees students complete professional experience activities such as internships, reflections and professional skill development in order to give students the opportunity to develop as professionals. While the program is well received by most stakeholders, it has remained largely the same for some time. Changes in the Higher Education sector, changing student needs and learning from the COVID-19 disruption have resulted in a review looking to redevelop the program.Typically a program review would be an opaque process for students if they were aware of it at all. However, UTS sought to bring students into the program development from an early stage. Engineering and IT students from any year of study were invited to apply to join a seven-week co-design studio over their Summer semester to reimagine professional practice at UTS. They were taken through the design thinking process to imagine a future program that meets the needs of all stakeholders. Students worked through empathising with past and current students, program academics, Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) experts, industry professionals and others they identified as important stakeholders. Additionally, the students completed independent research on context topics they identified as critical to understanding the space.The results of the project were that students identified three key foci for their program:•Supporting the development of a diverse student cohort•Improving the feedback loop between students, industry, and the University•Fostering connection(s) between the University and industryTo meet these aims the students proposed innovative solutions including a degree structure with an exit point for a lower qualification should a student not need the full qualification, and a flexi-points system to provide students access to a flexible professional development scheme tailored to each students’ needs.Throughout the studio the students independently developed both insights and ideas that had previously been raised by the University and new insights and ideas that the University had not considered. They developed their design thinking, professional practice, complex problem solving skills, and expressed an appreciation for the chance to better understand how and why the University works behind the scenes. From the perspective of subject designers, the process and engagement of students rein vigorated the academics affected by a long COVID-19 disruption that had seen diminished engagement from students.This process significantly benefited all involved through the development of skills and knowledge in students, the reinvigoration of academic staff, and the development of confirmatory and new insights and ideas for the University. This innovative practice will be broadened and continued at UTS and the co-design processes it supported as the norm rather than the exception when redeveloping course content and program structures." @default.
• W4310353782 created "2022-12-09" @default.
• W4310353782 creator A5002914157 @default.
• W4310353782 creator A5028704865 @default.
• W4310353782 creator A5059435206 @default.
• W4310353782 date "2022-10-08" @default.
• W4310353782 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4310353782 title "Co-designing an engineering professional practice program with students" @default.
• W4310353782 cites W2898342158 @default.
• W4310353782 cites W2996621777 @default.
• W4310353782 cites W3123525655 @default.
• W4310353782 cites W3163285132 @default.
• W4310353782 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962548" @default.
• W4310353782 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4310353782 type Work @default.
• W4310353782 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4310353782 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4310353782 hasAuthorship W4310353782A5002914157 @default.
• W4310353782 hasAuthorship W4310353782A5028704865 @default.
• W4310353782 hasAuthorship W4310353782A5059435206 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C110354214 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C45012715 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C5041995 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C540751848 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C110354214 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C111919701 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C127413603 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C144024400 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C15744967 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C19417346 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C41008148 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C45012715 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C5041995 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C509550671 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C51067260 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C540751848 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C71924100 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C76155785 @default.
• W4310353782 hasConceptScore W4310353782C98045186 @default.
• W4310353782 hasLocation W43103537821 @default.
• W4310353782 hasOpenAccess W4310353782 @default.
• W4310353782 hasPrimaryLocation W43103537821 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W1549951169 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W1767897839 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2060893191 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2068291245 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2181714116 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2383484397 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2608450098 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4310353782 hasRelatedWork W2186825070 @default.
• W4310353782 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4310353782 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4310353782 workType "article" @default.