FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4310680262> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4310680262 endingPage "16253" @default.
• W4310680262 startingPage "16253" @default.
• W4310680262 abstract "Incident reporting is an important method to identify risks because learning from the reports is crucial in developing and implementing effective improvements. A medical malpractice claims analysis is an important tool in any case. Both incident reports and claims show cases of damage caused to patients, despite incident reporting comprising near misses, cases where no event occurred and no-harm events. We therefore compare the two worlds to assess whether they are similar or definitively different. From 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2021, the claims database of Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS collected 843 claims. From 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, the incident-reporting database collected 1919 events. In order to compare the two, we used IBNR calculation, usually adopted by the insurance industry to determine loss to a company and to evaluate the real number of adverse events that occurred. Indeed, the number of reported adverse events almost overlapped with the total number of events, which is indicative that incurred-but-not-reported events are practically irrelevant. The distribution of damage events reported as claims in the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 and related to incidents that occurred in the months of the same period, grouped by quarter, was then compared with the distribution of damage events reported as adverse events and sentinel events in the same period, grouped by quarter. The analysis of the claims database showed that the claims trend is slightly decreasing. However, the analysis of the reports database showed that, in the period 2020–2021, the reports trend was increasing. In our study, the comparison of the two, malpractice claims and incident reporting, documented many differences and weak areas of overlap. Nevertheless, this contribution represents the first attempt to compare the two and new studies focusing on single types of adverse events are, therefore, desirable." @default.
• W4310680262 created "2022-12-15" @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5019960147 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5022823590 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5023548092 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5025921232 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5045590306 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5049840168 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5051896764 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5056198822 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5057696059 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5065492812 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5068786122 @default.
• W4310680262 creator A5072607968 @default.
• W4310680262 date "2022-12-05" @default.
• W4310680262 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4310680262 title "Malpractice Claims and Incident Reporting: Two Faces of the Same Coin?" @default.
• W4310680262 cites W1441493039 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W1936622395 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2254667017 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2283041611 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2299251378 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2332590983 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2475120410 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2560530538 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2603917712 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2766894903 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2916722198 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2924010325 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2924858020 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2940009943 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2946080730 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W2996309483 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W3025924416 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W3117606514 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W3120837297 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W3159743235 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W3166707802 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W4214707325 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W4280539170 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W4280594728 @default.
• W4310680262 cites W4283267320 @default.
• W4310680262 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316253" @default.
• W4310680262 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36498327" @default.
• W4310680262 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4310680262 type Work @default.
• W4310680262 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4310680262 countsByYear W43106802622023 @default.
• W4310680262 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5019960147 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5022823590 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5023548092 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5025921232 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5045590306 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5049840168 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5051896764 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5056198822 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5057696059 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5065492812 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5068786122 @default.
• W4310680262 hasAuthorship W4310680262A5072607968 @default.
• W4310680262 hasBestOaLocation W43106802621 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C2776798817 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C2909164965 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C85079727 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C126322002 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C15744967 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C166957645 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C17744445 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C194828623 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C197934379 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C199539241 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C2776798817 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C2777363581 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C2909164965 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C38652104 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C41008148 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C545542383 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C71924100 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C77805123 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C85079727 @default.
• W4310680262 hasConceptScore W4310680262C95457728 @default.
• W4310680262 hasIssue "23" @default.
• W4310680262 hasLocation W43106802621 @default.

• next